The Evaluation and Significance of Smart City Projects in Korea: Targeting Enterprises within the Smart City Association Convergence Alliance

被引:1
作者
Kim, Jaehwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Kongju Natl Univ, Dept Real Estate Studies, Gongju 32439, Chungcheongnam, South Korea
关键词
smart city; evaluation system; smart city convergence alliance enterprises; data envelopment analysis; operational efficiency; GENERATION;
D O I
10.3390/su16072697
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study identified, analysed, and prioritised significant factors for standardising the Korean smart city project evaluation system. We analysed the efficiency and productivity of companies currently providing smart city services, considering both policy and practical aspects. The prioritisation of smart city planning reflects the latest trends in South Korea, where urban planning is moving towards smart city planning. Furthermore, public-private and private-private partnership capacity-building highlights the importance of business scalability. This shows that smart city services are only stabilised when the private sector is involved in and leads the project, rather than focusing on public development. The feasibility of building intelligent facilities indicates that smart city projects should be implemented after securing cost-benefit feasibility. The results were used as the basis for an evaluation system, showing that, in smart city convergence alliances, small- and medium-sized enterprises achieved the highest efficiency by reducing inputs to 81% and 86% under the assumptions of constant and variable returns to scales, respectively. As the operational aspect is more problematic than the technical aspect, policy alternatives are necessary for smooth business progress, including increased flexibility of laws and institutions and the activation of policies that temporarily relieve regulations for smart city projects.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ahn Y., 2018, Establishment of a Smart City Model Based on Citizen Participation
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities, General Assembly 2018 Summary Report, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • [3] Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management
    Aronson, Myla F. J.
    Lepczyk, Christopher A.
    Evans, Karl L.
    Goddard, Mark A.
    Lerman, Susannah B.
    MacIvor, J. Scott
    Nilon, Charles H.
    Vargo, Timothy
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 (04) : 189 - 196
  • [4] Aurigi A., 2005, Knowledge Technology & Policy, V18, P12, DOI 10.1007/s12130-005-1013-z
  • [5] City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities
    Belanche, Daniel
    Casalo, Luis V.
    Orus, Carlos
    [J]. CITIES, 2016, 50 : 75 - 81
  • [6] Cavada M., 2017, Smart Cities
  • [7] Chang H., 2019, Information, V49, P67
  • [8] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [9] Cho J., 2021, Smart City Overseas Case Study in Singapore, Smart City Policy and Governance Research
  • [10] Cohen B., 2015, 3 GENERATIONS SMART