Quality and Readability Analysis of Online Information on First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion

被引:1
作者
Raja, Hamza M. [1 ,3 ]
DeShazo, Sterling J. [1 ]
Bowcutt, Jeffrey T. [1 ]
Chen, Jie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, John Sealy Sch Med, 301 Univ Blvd, Galveston, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, 307 Univ Blvd, Galveston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, John Sealy Sch Med, 301 Univ Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
Internet; joint fusion; metatarsophalangeal joint; online information; patient education;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2023.11.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Patients frequently turn to the internet to learn about their orthopedic procedures. This study evaluates the readability and quality of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint fusion information found online. We evaluated websites based on classification, search term, readability, HON code, DISCERN score, Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and an author-created MTP fusion index (MFI). The average readability of websites was 8.48 </n> 1.99, above the recommended sixth- or eighth-grade reading level. Almost half of all websites (48.98%) provided "poor" information. Keywords had no significant impact on the readability or quality of information. Academic/governmental websites had the highest quality of information, with the highest DISCERN and second highest MFI. Most websites (52.04%) were commercial and were the easiest to read, but had the second lowest DISCERN and MFI scores. Our results suggest that inappropriate information on the MTP joint fusion procedure is abundant online. Academic/governmental websites have the highest quality of information, but may be difficult for patients to comprehend. Many websites do have readable and relevant information. We recommend that physicians create a list of websites with accurate, relevant information for patients to circumvent the misinformation they may find while navigating and reading online. (c) 2023 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 261
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures [J].
Brezis, Mayer ;
Israel, Sarah ;
Weinstein-Birenshtock, Avital ;
Pogoda, Pnina ;
Sharon, Ayelet ;
Tauber, Renana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 20 (05) :352-357
[2]   DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices [J].
Charnock, D ;
Shepperd, S ;
Needham, G ;
Gann, R .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (02) :105-111
[3]   Internet use by orthopaedic outpatients - current trends and practices [J].
Fraval, Andrew ;
Chong, Yew Ming ;
Holcdorf, David ;
Plunkett, Virginia ;
Phong Tran .
AUSTRALASIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 5 (12) :633-638
[4]  
Health on the net, Health on the net, a not-for-profit organisation, promotes transparent and reliable health information online
[5]   Hallux rigidus [J].
Ho, Bryant ;
Baumhauer, Judith .
EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2017, 2 (01) :13-20
[6]   Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality [J].
Joury, Abdulaziz U. ;
Alshathri, Mashhoor ;
Alkhunaizi, Mohammad ;
Jaleesah, Najlaa ;
Pines, Jesse M. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (10) :1146-1152
[7]   Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion: Why and How? [J].
Rammelt, Stefan ;
Panzner, Ines ;
Mittlmeier, Thomas .
FOOT AND ANKLE CLINICS, 2015, 20 (03) :465-477
[8]   Readability of Patient Education Materials From High-Impact Medical Journals: A 20-Year Analysis [J].
Rooney, Michael K. ;
Santiago, Gaia ;
Perni, Subha ;
Horowitz, David P. ;
McCall, Anne R. ;
Einstein, Andrew J. ;
Jagsi, Reshma ;
Golden, Daniel W. .
JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2021, 8
[9]   Quality and Readability of Information Regarding Total Ankle Arthroplasty Available to Patients on the Internet [J].
Smith, Sydney ;
Jupiter, Daniel C. C. ;
Panchbhavi, Vinod K. K. ;
Chen, Jie .
FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2023, 16 (03) :243-250
[10]  
Southern MG, 2020, Over 25% of people click the first Google search result