Physics Pre-service Teachers' Conceptual Understanding of Scientific Literacy

被引:1
作者
Mi, Shuaishuai [1 ]
Zong, Tiantian [1 ]
Yang, Xiaojuan [2 ]
Gui, Weiling [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Phys & Elect, Jinan 250358, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Normal Univ, Fac Educ, Jinan 250014, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
SCIENCE-EDUCATION; TOPIC MODELS; VIEWS; TEXT; PERSPECTIVES; INSTRUCTION; STUDENTS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s11191-024-00520-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study used structural topic models (STMs) to analyze physics pre-service teachers' conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Participants included 126 physics pre-service teachers studying at Shandong Normal University in China. First, we used an open-ended questionnaire to collect the data. Second, STM was used to classify the data, which were divided into nine topics considering information about held-out probability, residuals, exclusivity, and semantic coherence of the words to topics. Third, the focus of these nine topics was explored, and the topics demonstrating gender-differentiated focus were also inspected. Finally, comparisons between the STM results and results of existing studies were performed. The following key findings were obtained: (1) nine topics relating to physics pre-service teachers' conceptual understanding of scientific literacy emerged, such as "beliefs and values about the reliability of information related to socio-scientific issues" and "key ideas of physics in high school." (2) Weak evidence confirmed gender-differentiated attention to only one topic, namely, beliefs and values about the reliability of information related to socio-scientific issues. Further, female pre-service teachers focused more on subjective aspects, while male pre-service teachers focused more on objective aspects. (3) Some of the topics obtained are consistent with the existing scientific literacy frameworks (science content; nature of science; and the relationships between science, technology, and society), while some topics are inconsistent with them; such similarities and discrepancies are discussed in detail, along with the implications of the findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1523 / 1549
页数:27
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Improving and Evaluating Topic Models and Other Models of Text [J].
Airoldi, Edoardo M. ;
Bischof, Jonathan M. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 111 (516) :1381-1403
[2]  
AKILLI M, 2022, KASTAMONU UNIV KASTA, V30, P925, DOI DOI 10.24106/kefdergi.1195726
[3]   Assessing preservice elementary teachers? conceptual understanding of scientific literacy [J].
Al Sultan, Adam ;
Henson, Harvey, Jr. ;
Lickteig, Duane .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2021, 102
[4]   Subjective quantitative studies of human agency [J].
Alkire, S .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2005, 74 (01) :217-260
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, BENCHM SCI LIT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Science for all Americans
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving
[8]   On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications [J].
Antonakis, John .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2017, 28 (01) :5-21
[9]  
Archer-Bradshaw RE, 2014, J Educ Social Res., DOI [10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n3p165, DOI 10.5901/JESR.2014.V4N3P165]
[10]  
Autieri S.M., 2016, European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, V4, P75, DOI [10.30935/scimath/9455, DOI 10.30935/SCIMATH/9455]