Mission oriented capability planning method for weapon system of systems

被引：0
|
作者：
Qiao H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhan R.-J. [1 ]
Lin Y. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Equipment Management and Support, Armed Police Force Engineering University, Xi'an
[2] Armed Police Force Inner Mongolia Corps, Hohhot
来源：
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2020年 / 35卷 / 08期
关键词：
Capability planning; Capability requirement; Effectiveness value; Mission oriented; Prospect theory; Weapon system of systems (WSoS);
D O I：
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2018.1411
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Capability planning of weapon system of systems (WSoS) is an important part of the WSoS research area. The number of troops that can be dispatched and the ability to carry weapons are limited in mission fulfillment. Therefore, a capability planning method based on the effectiveness value of WSoS is proposed. Using the method, the capacity planning solutions for troops of different sizes can be quickly found by considering the capability requirement of various tasks in combat, and the relationship between the weapon equipment supporting different capabilities and their number. Focusing on the missions and analysing their capability requirement, a normalized combat capability effectiveness model is established firstly. Then, based on prospect theory, the effectiveness function of combat capability considering risk factors is proposed. Furthermore, the WSoS capability planning model based on effectiveness value are built under the constrain of risks and number of weapon units, the capability planning solution can be obtained with the maximum effectiveness value of WSoS. Finally, armed police force's anti-terrorism mission is analyzed as a example to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method. © 2020, Editorial Office of Control and Decision. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2042 / 2048
页数：6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Zhao Q S, Tan W S, Li M J, Research on description of weapon equipment system of systems capability spaces, Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 31, 1, pp. 135-140, (2009)
  • [2] Paul K D., Handbook on long term defense planning, (2003)
  • [3] McQuay W K., Collaborative environments for capability-based planning, Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science IX, 5805, pp. 318-327, (2005)
  • [4] Davis P K, Shaver R D, Beck J, Portfolio-analysis methods for assessing capability options, pp. 102-117, (2008)
  • [5] Ge B, Hipel K W, Fang L, An interactive portfolio decision analysis approach for system-of-systems architecting using the graph model for conflict resolution, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics: Systems, 44, 10, pp. 1328-1346, (2014)
  • [6] Ross A M., Multi-attribute tradespace exploration with concurrent design as a value-centric framework for space system architecture and design, (2003)
  • [7] Chattopadhyay D., A method for tradespace exploration of systems of systems, (2009)
  • [8] Wolf R A., Multiobjective collaborative optimization of systems of systems, (2005)
  • [9] Ye G Q, Jiang J, Chen S, Design optimization of weapon system of systems based on collaborative multidisciplinary decision-making, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 34, 11, pp. 2256-2263, (2012)
  • [10] Luman R R, Upgrading complex systems of systems: A CAIV methodology for warfare area requirements allocation, Military Operations Research, 5, 2, pp. 53-75, (2000)
123