The Power of Numeric Evidence in Science Communication

被引:1
作者
Peters, Ellen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bunquin, Jon Benedik [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Ctr Sci Commun Res, Sch Journalism & Commun, Eugene, OR USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR USA
[3] Univ Oregon, Ctr Sci Commun Res, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
science communication; numeracy; decision-making; deficit model; risk perception; risk communication; numeric cognition; informed choice; CANCER-PATIENTS; INFORMATION; HEALTH; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; NUMBERS; IMPACT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/09637214241242465
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Advantages and disadvantages exist for presenting numeric information in science communication. On the one hand, public innumeracy and experts' concerns about providing numbers suggest not always showing them. On the other hand, people often prefer getting them, and their provision can increase comprehension, trust, and healthy behaviors while reducing risk overestimates and supporting decision-making autonomy. Presenting numeric facts without considering their comprehensibility and usability, however, is like throwing good money after bad. We summarize research concerning three theory-based strategies that improve the understanding and use of numbers by decreasing cognitive effort (e.g., doing the math for the audience), being consistent with principles of numeric cognition, and providing affective meaning.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 180
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Knowledge and the Prediction of Behavior: The Role of Information Accuracy in the Theory of Planned Behavior
    Ajzen, Icek
    Joyce, Nicholas
    Sheikh, Sana
    Cote, Nicole Gilbert
    [J]. BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 33 (02) : 101 - 117
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, Communicating science effectively: A research agenda, DOI DOI 10.17226/23674
  • [4] Physician Trainees' Decision Making and Information Processing: Choice Size and Medicare Part D
    Barnes, Andrew J.
    Hanoch, Yaniv
    Martynenko, Melissa
    Wood, Stacey
    Rice, Thomas
    Federman, Alex D.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [5] Large numbers cause magnitude neglect: The case of government expenditures
    Boyce-Jacino, Christina
    Peters, Ellen
    Galvani, Alison P.
    Chapman, Gretchen B.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (28)
  • [6] Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding
    Damman, Olga C.
    De Jong, Anco
    Hibbard, Judith H.
    Timmermans, Danielle R. M.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (11) : 860 - 869
  • [7] Helping Patients Decide: Ten Steps to Better Risk Communication
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    Ubel, Peter A.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (19): : 1436 - 1443
  • [8] Communicating Health Risks With Visual Aids
    Garcia-Retamero, Rocio
    Cokely, Edward T.
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 22 (05) : 392 - 399
  • [9] The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication
    Gurmankin, AD
    Baron, J
    Annstrong, K
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2004, 24 (03) : 265 - 271
  • [10] Factors Affecting Physicians' Intentions to Communicate Personalized Prognostic Information to Cancer Patients at the End of Life: An Experimental Vignette Study
    Han, Paul K. J.
    Dieckmann, Nathan F.
    Holt, Christina
    Gutheil, Caitlin
    Peters, Ellen
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 36 (06) : 703 - 713