Demonstrating multiple attenuation with model-driven processing using neural networks

被引:8
作者
Bugge A.J. [1 ]
Evensen A.K. [1 ]
Lie J.E. [1 ]
Nilsen E.H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lundin Energy Norway AS, Lysaker
来源
Leading Edge | 2021年 / 40卷 / 11期
关键词
artificial intelligence; multiples; radon transform;
D O I
10.1190/tle40110831.1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Some of the key tasks in seismic processing involve suppressing multiples and noise that interfere with primary events. Conventional multiple attenuation on seismic prestack data is time-consuming and subjective. As an alternative, we propose model-driven processing using a convolutional neural network trained on synthetically modeled training data. The crucial part of our approach is to generate appropriate training data. Here, we compute a generic data set with pairs of synthetic gathers with and without multiples. Because we generate the primaries first and then add multiples, we ensure that we have perfect target data without any multiple energy. To compute generic and realistic training data, we include elements of wave propagation physics and implement a randomized flexibility of settings such as the wavelet, frequency content, degree of random noise, and amplitude variation with offset effects with each gather pair. A fully convolutional neural network is trained on the synthetic data in order to learn to suppress the noise and multiples. Evaluations of the approach on benchmark data indicate that our trained network is faster than conventional multiple attenuation because it can be run efficiently on a modern GPU, and it has the potential to better preserve primary amplitudes. Multiple removal with model-driven processing is demonstrated on seismic field data, and the results are compared to conventional multiple attenuation using a commercial Radon algorithm. The model-driven approach performs well when applied to real common-depth point gathers, and it successfully removes multiples, even where the multiples interfere with the primary signals on the near offsets. © 2021 by The Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 836
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Harding A.J., Inversion methods for τ-ρ Maps of near offset data - Linear inversion, Geophysical Prospecting, 33, 5, pp. 674-695, (1985)
[2]  
Hu L., Zheng X., Duan Y., Yan X., Hu Y., Zhang X., First-arrival picking with a U-net convolutional network, Geophysics, 84, 6, pp. U45-U57, (2019)
[3]  
Li J., Wu X., Hu J., Deep learning for simultaneous seismic image super-resolution and denoising, 90th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, pp. 1661-1665, (2020)
[4]  
Ronneberger O., Fischer P., Brox T., U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, (2015)
[5]  
Wang Z., Bovik A., Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 26, 1, pp. 98-117, (2009)
[6]  
Wang E., Nealon J., Applying machine learning to 3D seismic image denoising and enhancement, Interpretation, 7, 3, pp. SE131-SE139, (2019)
[7]  
Wu X., Liang L., Shi Y., Fomel S., FaultSeg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation, Geophysics, 84, 3, pp. IM35-IM45, (2019)
[8]  
Zhao H., Gallo O., Frosio I., Kautz J., Loss functions for image restoration with neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 3, 1, pp. 47-57, (2018)