Efficacy and safety of low-dose esketamine for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Deng, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Yun-Feng [1 ]
Tang, Zheng-Guo [2 ]
Lei, Hua-Juan [1 ]
Tan, Chuan-Chuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Chinese Med, Hosp 1, Digest Endoscopy Ctr, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Third Hosp Changsha, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
esketamine; propofol; anesthesia; painless gastrointestinal endoscopy; meta-analysis; SEDATION; PROPOFOL; KETAMINE; GASTROSCOPY;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2024.1364546
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Object: The benefits of low-dose esketamine for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy remain unclear. As such, the present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose esketamine for this procedure. Methods: Seven common databases were searched for clinical studies investigating low-dose esketamine for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was performed to synthesize and analyze the data extracted from studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Results: Meta-analysis revealed that, compared with propofol, low-dose esketamine in combination with propofol significantly reduced recovery time by 0.56 min (mean difference [MD] -0.56%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.08 to -0.05, p = 0.03), induction time by 9.84 s (MD -9.84, 95% CI -12.93 to -6.75, p < 0.00001), propofol dosage by 51.05 mg (MD -51.05, 95% CI -81.53 to -20.57, p = 0.01), and increased mean arterial pressure by 6.23 mmHg (MD 6.23, 95% CI 1.37 to 11.08, p = 0.01). Meanwhile, low-dose esketamine reduced injection pain by 63% (relative risk [RR] 0.37, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.49, p < 0.00001), involuntary movements by 40% (RR 0.60, 95% Cl 0.42 to 0.85, p < 0.005), choking by 42% (RR 0.58, 95% Cl 0.38 to 0.88, p = 0.01), bradycardia by 68% (RR 0.32, 95% Cl 0.18 to 0.58, p = 0.0002), hypotension by 71% (RR 0.29, 95% Cl 0.21 to 0.40, p < 0.00001), respiratory depression by 63% (RR 0.37, 95% 0.26 to 0.51, p < 0.00001), additional cases of propofol by 53% (RR 0.47, 95% Cl 0.29 to 0.77, p = 0.002), and increased hypertension by 1000% (RR 11.00, 95% Cl 1.45 to 83.28, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in mean heart rate, mean oximetry saturation, delirium, dizziness, vomiting, tachycardia, and hypoxemia. Subgroup analyses revealed that, compared with other dose groups, 0.25 mg/kg esketamine afforded additional benefits in recovery and induction time, mean arterial pressure, involuntary movements, hypoxemia, and respiratory depression. Conclusion: Low-dose esketamine was found to be safe and effective for providing anesthesia during gastrointestinal endoscopy, with 0.25 mg/kg identified as the optimal dose within the dosage ranges examined. However, caution should be exercised when administering this drug to patients with inadequate preoperative blood pressure control.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lian, Xianghong
    Lin, Yunzhu
    Luo, Ting
    Jing, Yang
    Yuan, Hongbo
    Guo, Yixin
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xianghong Lian
    Yunzhu Lin
    Ting Luo
    Yang Jing
    Hongbo Yuan
    Yixin Guo
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of esketamine for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Yu, Yunfeng
    Deng, Juan
    Tong, Keke
    Yin, Yuman
    Yu, Rong
    Tan, Chuanchuan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [4] The efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yunjie
    Shi, Yuye
    He, Zhengmei
    Chen, Qiuni
    Liu, Zhenyou
    Yu, Liang
    Wang, Chunling
    PLATELETS, 2019, 30 (06) : 690 - 697
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of alfentanil plus propofol versus propofol only in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis
    Yang, Huan
    Shi, Xiaoling
    Li, Jinping
    Yang, Longqiu
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (32) : E34745
  • [6] The efficacy and safety of esketamine in pediatric anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Bin-Sen
    Zhang, Xiao-Jia
    Wang, Chun-ai
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (12) : 5661 - 5663
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Bisoprolol/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination for the Treatment of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cicero, Arrigo F. G.
    Alghasab, Naif Saad
    Tocci, Giuliano
    Desideri, Giovambattista
    Fiorini, Giulia
    Fogacci, Federica
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (15)
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Atropine on Myopia Prevention in Premyopic Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Ssu-Hsien
    Tseng, Bor-Yuan
    Wang, Jen-Hung
    Chiu, Cheng-Jen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (05)
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cui, Yu-qing
    Ding, Xian-fei
    Liang, Huo-yan
    Wang, Dong
    Zhang, Xiao-juan
    Li, Li-feng
    Kan, Quan-cheng
    Wang, Le-xin
    Sun, Tong-wen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (03) : 207 - 213
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Wen-Wen
    Jiang, Juan
    Gao, Jie
    Zhang, Xiu-Zhen
    Li, Yuan-Min
    Liu, Yan-Lin
    Dang, He-Qin
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (03) : 296 - 303