Cross-regional economic impact of carbon emission regulations: A quantitative spatial equilibrium model for China

被引:3
作者
Chen, Dongxu [1 ]
Huang, Yin [2 ]
Tan, Nairong [1 ]
Hong, Tao [1 ]
Ma, Tao [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Management, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Sch Business, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] 92 Xidazhi St, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Quantitative spatial economics; Emission regulation; Regional economic changes; Input -output linkages; Climate change policy; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; POLLUTION; PRODUCTIVITY; INDUSTRY; US; TRADE; COMPETITIVENESS; REDUCTION; POLICIES; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.strueco.2024.03.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We develop and quantitatively evaluate a spatial general equilibrium model that incorporates carbon emission regulations. We study the impact of emission regulation on the economies of regions within a country under climate change mitigation goals, and how the impact of emission regulation in one region influences other regions through regional-sectoral linkages. The model is calibrated using Chinese regional and sectoral data, and several counterfactual exercises are performed. The results indicate that undifferentiated increases in emission regulation across regions have resulted in inter-regional differences in real GDP changes; however, "equityoriented" regionally differentiated emissions regulations reduce this imbalance. Regarding interactions between regions, negative impacts on the economy are characterized by geographical proximity, whereas positive impacts are not geographically constrained. Sectoral linkages exacerbate the negative economic impacts of emission regulations and widen regional disparities. Additionally, we demonstrate the extended application of our model through two case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 462
页数:25
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms [J].
Albrizio, Silvia ;
Kozluk, Tomasz ;
Zipperer, Vera .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :209-226
[2]   TRADE AND THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SPATIAL ECONOMY [J].
Allen, Treb ;
Arkolakis, Costas .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2014, 129 (03) :1085-1140
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, IPCC, 2022., DOI [10.1017/9781009157926, DOI 10.1017/9781009157926]
[4]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[5]   Climate policy and economic growth [J].
Bretschger, Lucas .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 :1-15
[6]   Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries [J].
Brunnermeier, SB ;
Cohen, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) :278-293
[7]   Emissions savings from equitable energy demand reduction [J].
Buchs, Milena ;
Cass, Noel ;
Mullen, Caroline ;
Lucas, Karen ;
Ivanova, Diana .
NATURE ENERGY, 2023, 8 (7) :758-769
[8]   Fairness, effectiveness, and needs satisfaction: new options for designing climate policies [J].
Buchs, Milena ;
Ivanova, Diana ;
Schnepf, Sylke, V .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (12)
[9]   Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets [J].
Burke, Marshall ;
Davis, W. Matthew ;
Diffenbaugh, Noah S. .
NATURE, 2018, 557 (7706) :549-+
[10]   Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector [J].
Burtraw, D ;
Krupnick, A ;
Palmer, K ;
Paul, A ;
Toman, M ;
Bloyd, C .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (03) :650-673