Assessing the benefits of urban consolidation centres: an overview based on a systematic literature review

被引:4
作者
Gillstrom, Henrik [1 ]
Bjorklund, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
City logistics; green logistics; performance indicators; closed loop supply chains; urban transhipment; city hub; CITY LOGISTICS; VEHICLES; METHODOLOGY; CHALLENGES; EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2024.2348639
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Urban consolidation centres (UCC) have often been highlighted as a solution to reducing freight vehicle kilometres, emissions, and congestion in urban areas. However, previous studies have presented vastly different results regarding the environmental and social benefits when UCCs are implemented. Therefore, this study aims to provide an overview of research on the sustainability assessment of UCCs, to describe dominant themes, and identify why assessments differ. A systematic literature review approach employing a content analysis was used to create the overview and identify the dominant themes in the quantification of the sustainability benefits of UCCs. As a complement, a cross-case analysis was applied to compare the results and to identify underlying differences between the studies. The content analysis revealed three dominant themes, relating to: (i) modelling aspects, (ii) different UCC set-ups, and (iii) the different performance measurements applied. Furthermore, improved consolidation is often described as the largest environmental benefit of implementing UCCs but our results show that the largest benefit can be found in switching to more environmentally friendly vehicles. However, the cross-case analysis revealed difficulties in determining the benefits of implementing UCCs because the assessment of benefits differ vastly between studies. These differences can be explained by the different scope of the system and whether or not other measures were implemented alongside a UCC. This review also highlights seven important gaps in the research that can be used to guide future research, such as a lack of methodological diversity, since most studies employ mathematical modelling, as well as a lack of transparency regarding input and output data. This is a barrier when evaluating the benefits of introducing UCCs.
引用
收藏
页码:972 / 991
页数:20
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Alessandrini A, 2012, EUR TRANSP
[2]   A multi-criteria spatial evaluation framework to optimise the siting of freight consolidation facilities in inner-city areas [J].
Aljohani, Khalid ;
Thompson, Russell G. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 138 :51-69
[3]   The Role of Urban Consolidation Centres in Sustainable Freight Transport [J].
Allen, Julian ;
Browne, Michael ;
Woodburn, Allan ;
Leonardi, Jacques .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2012, 32 (04) :473-490
[4]  
Ambrosini C, 2013, EUR TRANSP
[5]   Carbon credits and urban freight consolidation: An experiment using agent based simulation [J].
Anand, Nilesh ;
van Duin, Ron ;
Tavasszy, Lorant .
RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2021, 85
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Qualitative data analysis: amethods sourcebook, DOI DOI 10.4236/JGIS.2012.44041
[7]  
[Anonymous], About Us
[8]   A hybrid approach integrating Affinity Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (02) :573-584
[9]   A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, S. S. ;
Goyal, S. K. .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2011, 53 (1-2) :98-109
[10]  
Benjelloun A., 2008, Transportation and land use interaction, proceedings TRANSLU'08, V8, P269