Health Benefits from Improved Air Quality: Evidence from Pollution Regulations in China's " 2+26 " Cities

被引:0
作者
Xie, Tingting [1 ]
Wang, Yong [2 ]
Yuan, Ye [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Ecol & Environm, Policy Res Ctr Environm & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Inst Global Hlth & Dev, Sch Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Air pollution; Environmental governance; Health benefits; Social welfare; SUSTAINED EXPOSURE; INFANT-MORTALITY; LIFE EXPECTANCY; IMPACT; PM2.5; TIANJIN; O-3; POPULATION; SATELLITE; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-024-00860-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study assesses the health benefits of better air quality by examining the causal impact of China's stringent "2+26" regional air pollution control policy on local air quality and population health. Employing a spatial regression discontinuity design that capitalizes on the policy's location-specific features, we present compelling evidence that the 2+26 policy results in an average reduction of 12.2 units in the local Air Quality Index (AQI) and a 47.0% decrease in per capita medical expenditure from 2014 to 2018. A one-unit reduction in AQI corresponds to a 0.88% reduction in per capita annual medical spending, equivalent to RMB 30.2 (US$4.6). These health gains stem from reduced chronic disease prevalence and improved subjective well-being. Nationally, air quality improvement during 2014-2018 could save RMB 674 billion (US$104 billion) annually in national direct medical costs, constituting 11.6% of national medical expenditure in 2018. Our findings underscore the substantial health and welfare gains achievable through pollution controls in developing countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1221
页数:47
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Aguilar-Gomez S, 2022, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V14, P403, DOI [10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-021816, 10.3386/w29848]
[2]   AS THE WIND BLOWS: THE EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM EXPOSURE TO AIR POLLUTION ON MORTALITY [J].
Anderson, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2020, 18 (04) :1886-1927
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, The Economic Consequences of Air Pollution
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, EC COST HLTH IMPACT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Cost of Pollution in China
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Who global air quality guidelines
[7]   Does the Effect of Pollution on Infant Mortality Differ Between Developing and Developed Countries? Evidence from Mexico City [J].
Arceo, Eva ;
Hanna, Rema ;
Oliva, Paulina .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2016, 126 (591) :257-280
[8]  
Barwick P.J., 2018, The Morbidity Cost of Air Pollution: Evidence from Consumer Spending in China
[9]  
Barwick PanleJia., 2019, FOG SMOG VALUE POLLU, DOI [10.3386/w26541, DOI 10.3386/W26541]
[10]   Impacts of sea-land and mountain-valley circulations on the air pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH): A case study [J].
Bei, Naifang ;
Zhao, Linna ;
Wu, Jiarui ;
Li, Xia ;
Feng, Tian ;
Li, Guohui .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2018, 234 :429-438