Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory

被引:2
作者
Jaen, Irene [1 ]
Vidal-Arenas, Veronica [1 ]
Suso-Ribera, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Pastor, M. Carmen [1 ]
Garcia-Palacios, Azucena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
[2] Inst Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
来源
CLINICA Y SALUD | 2024年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
Cognitive Flexibility; Internal consistency; Construct validity; Adaptation; Flexibilidad cognitiva; Consistencia interna; Validez de constructo; Adaptaci & oacute; n; NEGATIVE LIFE EVENTS; EMOTION REGULATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; DEPRESSION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.5093/clysa2024a3
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Cognitive flexibility, identified as a transdiagnostic process in psychopathology, lacks specific Spanish-validated assessment tools. This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory in a Spanish sample (N = 300, mean age = 22.66, SD = 4.92), 76% women). Method: An exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) was used to test the inventory's latent structure. Reliability was calculated, as well as construct validity evidence with measures of emotion regulation, attributional style, and depression. Results: The original bifactorial model of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (Alternatives and Control scales) was replicated and obtained good fit indices. One item was excluded due to problematic factor loadings, yielding a final version with 19 items. Evidence of validity and reliability was obtained. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory showed satisfactory psychometric properties, making it a suitable measure for the assessment of cognitive flexibility in the Spanish population. Objetivo: La flexibilidad cognitiva, identificada como un proceso transdiagn & oacute;stico en la psicopatolog & iacute;a, carece de herramientas espec & iacute;ficas validadas en espa & ntilde;ol. Este estudio se propone examinar las propiedades psicom & eacute;tricas del Inventario de Flexibilidad Cognitiva en una muestra espa & ntilde;ola (N = 300, media de edad = 22.66, DT = 4.92), 76% mujeres). M & eacute;todo: Se utiliz & oacute; un modelo exploratorio de ecuaciones estructurales para comprobar la estructura latente. Se calcul & oacute; la fiabilidad, as & iacute; como la evidencia de validez de constructo con medidas de regulaci & oacute;n emocional, estilo atribucional y depresi & oacute;n. Resultados: Se replic & oacute; el modelo bifactorial original del Inventario de Flexibilidad Cognitiva (escalas de alternativas y control) y se obtuvieron buenos & iacute;ndices de ajuste. Se excluy & oacute; un & iacute;tem debido a cargas factoriales problem & aacute;ticas, por lo que la versi & oacute;n final incluy & oacute; 19 & iacute;tems. Se obtuvieron pruebas de validez y fiabilidad. Conclusiones: La versi & oacute;n espa & ntilde;ola del Inventario de Flexibilidad Cognitiva mostr & oacute; propiedades psicom & eacute;tricas satisfactorias, por lo que es una medida adecuada para la evaluaci & oacute;n de la flexibilidad cognitiva en la poblaci & oacute;n espa & ntilde;ola.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 110
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan ;
Schweizer, Susanne .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) :217-237
[2]  
ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
[3]   Brooding and reflecting in an interpersonal context [J].
Bastin, Margot ;
Bijttebier, Patricia ;
Raes, Filip ;
Vasey, Michael W. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 63 :100-105
[4]  
Beck, 1979, COGNITIVE THERAPY DE
[5]  
Beck A.T., 1996, Manual for the revised Beck Depression Inventory-II, DOI [DOI 10.1037/T00742-000, 10.1037/t00742-000]
[6]   The Development of the Unified Protocol for the Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: A Case Study [J].
Boisseau, Christina L. ;
Farchione, Todd J. ;
Fairholme, Christopher P. ;
Ellard, Kristen K. ;
Barlow, David H. .
COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE, 2010, 17 (01) :102-113
[7]   Regulatory Flexibility: An Individual Differences Perspective on Coping and Emotion Regulation [J].
Bonanno, George A. ;
Burton, Charles L. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (06) :591-612
[8]   COMPARATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY - CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 11 (03) :215-229
[9]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? [J].
Brown, TA .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2003, 41 (12) :1411-1426
[10]  
Checa I., 2018, Neuropsychiatry, V8, P1533, DOI [10.4172/Neuropsychiatry.1000488, DOI 10.4172/NEUROPSYCHIATRY.1000488]