Efficiency-Noise Sample Analysis Method of Propeller Based on Potential Flow Theory

被引：0
|
作者：
Wang C. [1 ]
Zhao L.-M. [1 ]
Sun C. [1 ]
Chang S.-M. [1 ]
Wu H. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin
来源：
Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology | 2022年 / 43卷 / 09期
关键词：
Contracted and loaded tip propeller; Noise prediction; Optimal design; Potential flow theory; Variable parameter analysis;
D O I：
10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210410
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to improve efficiency and reduce noise，propeller design needs to balance the influence of different parameters on design goals based on accurate performance predictions. This paper used the panel method as the main method to predict the hydrodynamic performance of the CLT（Contracted and Loaded Tip）propeller，and introduced a noise model for the noise prediction.In the whole process，the 4-blade CLT propeller —P1727 propeller is used as the female propeller. Within the range of the pitch ratio of 0.9 to 1.2 times of the original pitch ratio，three forms of blade number（3-blade，4-blade，5-blade）are considered，and the hydrodynamic performance and noise performance of 100 design propeller cases are calculated finally.The propeller is designed to meet the thrust requirements of a medium-sized ship，and to find the minimum blade tip vortex noise and maximum efficiency solution set of the propeller.The calculation results show that the number of propeller blades is inversely proportional to the noise，the efficiency and noise performance are affected by the pitch ratio and show a certain regularity，when the thrust value is fixed. For the high-efficiency propeller P1727，changes in the pitch ratio and the number of blades will result in a certain range of balance between efficiency and noise，which can cope with different design requirements. © 2022 Journal of Propulsion Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Abrahamsen Kai, The Ship as an Underwater Noise Source［C］, Edinburgh：11th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, (2012)
  • [2] Sasajima T, Tanibayasi H., Contribution to Cavitation Committee［C］, Kobe：Proceeding of 18th International Towing Tank Conference, (1987)
  • [3] Sharma S，, Mani K，, Arakeri V H., Cavitation Noise Studies on Marine Propellers［J］, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 138, 2, pp. 255-283, (1990)
  • [4] Seol H，, Park C，, Kim K S，, Et al., Background Noise Analysis of the MOERI Cavitation Tunnel & Propeller BPF Noise Measurement［J］, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 44, 4, pp. 408-416, (2007)
  • [5] Korkut E，, Atlar M., An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Foul Release Coating Application on Performance，Noise and Cavitation Characteristics of Marine Propellers［J］, Ocean Engineering, 41, pp. 1-12, (2012)
  • [6] Bagheri M R，, Mehdigholi H，, Seif M S，, Et al., An Experimental and Numerical Prediction of Marine Propeller Noise under Cavitating and Non-Cavitating Conditions ［J］, Brodogradnja, 66, 2, pp. 29-45, (2015)
  • [7] Kowalczyk S，, Felicjancik J., Numericaland Experimental Propeller Noise Investigations［J］, Ocean Engineering, 120, pp. 108-115, (2016)
  • [8] Salvatore F，, Ianniello S., Preliminary Results on Acoustic Modeling of Cavitating Propellers［J］, Journal of Computational Mechanics, 32, pp. 291-300, (2003)
  • [9] Seol H，, Jung B，, Suh J C，, Et al., Prediction of Non-Cavitating Underwater Propeller Noise［J］, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 257, 1, pp. 131-156, (2002)
  • [10] Leaper R C，, Renilson M R., A Review of Practical Methods for Reducing Underwater Noise Pollution from Large Commercial Vessels［J］, Marine Engineering, 154, 2, pp. 79-88, (2012)
123