Assessing the role of technological districts in regional innovation policies: a network analysis of collaborative R&D projects

被引:1
作者
De Iudicibus, Alessandro [1 ]
Prota, Laura [2 ]
Savoia, Francesco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania L Vanvitelli, Dept Econ, Capua, Italy
[2] Amer Univ Rome, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Management, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Innovation networks; Technological districts; Regional development; Cohesion Policy; Policy evaluation; Social network analysis; O38; R58; 018; TRIPLE-HELIX; KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEMS; CLUSTERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-024-10088-4
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As highlighted in systemic approaches to innovation, regions play an increasingly important role in designing and implementing place-based innovation policies. A wide debate has emerged on the limits and validity of different policy models, for example, between "platform" and "district-based" approaches or between a "corporatist" and an "evolutionary" Triple Helix. Within the EU Cohesion Policy framework, a number of technological districts (TDs) have been established since 2005 in the Italian "Convergence" regions to foster competitiveness, innovation, and research industry linkages. TDs have become critical actors in knowledge and technology transfer processes, and a significant amount of funding has been devoted to their development in the National Operational Programme for Research and Competitiveness (PON-R&C). In this work, we use methods drawn from social network analysis to locate TDs within the wider collaboration networks established through the PON-R&C programme. We highlight the specificity of TDs within the general policy and assess their ability to promote organisational and sectoral heterogeneity among project participants. We find that different network architectures coexist under the same policy umbrella and relate this variety to the ideal models identified in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 95
页数:34
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS 3)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, REGIONS INNOVATION P, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264097803-EN
[3]   Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases [J].
Asheim, Bjorn T. ;
Boschma, Ron ;
Cooke, Philip .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2011, 45 (07) :893-904
[4]  
Barca F., 2009, AN AGENDA FOR A REFORMED COHESION POLICY. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations
[5]  
Batagelj V, 2014, WILEY SER COMPU QUAN, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118915370
[6]   Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation [J].
Bathelt, H ;
Malmberg, A ;
Maskell, P .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2004, 28 (01) :31-56
[7]  
Benneworth P., 2011, OECD REGIONAL DEV WO, V2011/01, DOI [10.1787/5kgc6d80nns4-en, DOI 10.1787/5KGC6D80NNS4-EN]
[8]   Hunting scale-free properties in R&D collaboration networks: Self-organization, power-law and policy issues in the European aerospace research area [J].
Biggiero, Lucio ;
Angelini, Pier Paolo .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 94 :21-43
[9]  
Boschma R., 2013, PAPERS EVOLUTIONARY, V1322
[10]   Models of university technology transfer: analyses and policies [J].
Calcagnini, Giorgio ;
Favaretto, Ilario .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2016, 41 (04) :655-660