Optimization Models in Water Resources Management and Security: A Critical Review

被引:1
作者
Sinha, Gyanesh Kumar [1 ]
Purwar, Anuj Kumar [2 ]
机构
[1] Bennett Univ, Sch Management, Greater Noida, India
[2] Indira Gandhi Natl Open Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, New Delhi, India
关键词
Water resources optimization; Water resources management; Water security; Simulation-optimization model; Social explanation; ObR-E; Agent-based model; COST-BENEFIT; RESERVOIR; ALGORITHM; SYSTEM; RISK;
D O I
10.33889/IJMEMS.2024.9.1.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper reviews optimization models in the context of water resources management and security. The article is instituted on four fundamental pillars: (a) an understanding of the quantum of key optimization techniques adopted by the researchers over the past few decades in managing water resources, (b) an enumeration of these techniques, both in terms of their brief mathematical structures and with reference to their representative applications in managing water resources so as to conform to one of the four perspectives of water security, viz. welfare, equity, sustainability, and risk, (c) an evaluation of major challenges associated with these conventional equation-based optimization techniques, including the perceptive account of the distinction between the gradient-based local optimization and non-gradient global optimization, and finally, (d) an assessment of context-sensitive appropriateness of simulation-based bottom-up modeling schemes, with special reference to evolutionary algorithms. The review emphasizes that the ontology of conventional equation-based models lies in an aggregate manifestation of social behavior and, as a result, it fails to capture individuals' behaviors juxtaposed with ecological and hydrological systems while modeling complex water resources. On the contrary, the expediency of the domain of operational research in responding to societal problems ensuing from a scarce natural resource like water lies in bottom-up optimization schemes, which are more obliging in the sense that they can incarcerate such social explanations in the modeling frame based on local values.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 146
页数:18
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Solving unconfined groundwater flow management problems with successive linear programming [J].
Ahlfeld, David P. ;
Baro-Montes, Gemma .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 134 (05) :404-412
[2]  
Al-Adhadh N.H., 1978, Social Science Working Paper, 218
[3]   Optimization Model for Agricultural Reclaimed Water Allocation Using Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming [J].
Aljanabi, Ahmed A. ;
Mays, Larry W. ;
Fox, Peter .
WATER, 2018, 10 (10)
[4]  
Aminravan F, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 JOINT IFSA WORLD CONGRESS AND NAFIPS ANNUAL MEETING (IFSA/NAFIPS), P1143, DOI 10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608561
[5]  
Andrews R.A., 1973, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, V9, P258, DOI [10.1111/j.1752-1688.1973.tb01733.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1752-1688.1973.TB01733.X]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Towards water security: A framework for action
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9780470686652.EAE495, 10.1002/9780470686652.eae495]
[8]   Evaluating water resources management scenarios considering the hierarchical structure of decision-makers and ecosystem services-based criteria [J].
Behboudian, Massoud ;
Kerachian, Reza ;
Motlaghzadeh, Kasra ;
Ashrafi, Saeed .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 751
[9]   DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING [J].
BELLMAN, R .
SCIENCE, 1966, 153 (3731) :34-&
[10]  
BELLMAN RE, 1970, MANAGE SCI B-APPL, V17, pB141