Calculation of average temperature of frozen soil wall by single row-piped freezing

被引：0
作者：
Hu X. [1 ,2 ]
Liu Y. [1 ,2 ]
Hong Z. [1 ,2 ]
Han Y. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
[2] Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai
[3] Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai
来源：
Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society | 2019年 / 44卷 / 04期
关键词：
Analytical solution of steady-state temperature field; Artificial ground freezing; Average temperature; Numerical simulation; Single row-piped freezing;
D O I：
10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2018.0709
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In the artificial ground freezing project, the average temperature is the basic parameter for evaluating the frozen soil curtain state and the mechanical analysis of the frozen soil curtain. The average temperature calculation of the frozen soil curtain formed by the single-row pipe freezing is studied in this paper. Based on the analytical solution of the steady-state temperature field of a single-row pipe freezing, the integral calculation of the temperature is directly performed. Using the partial integral method and the integral median theorem, the calculation formula of the average temperature of the single-row tube freezing is obtained, and the formula is simplified according to the actual parameter values in the project. Considering that the temperature field analytical solution is not applicable in the frozen pipe area, the same integral strategy is used to solve the influence of the frozen pipe area on the average temperature calculation, and the average temperature calculation formula is corrected. The results of the average temperature calculation formula were compared with the results of the thermal steady-state numerical simulation of the single-row pipe freezing using ANSYS. The pipe spacing l=0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 m, and there are six kinds of frozen development states with relative thickness ξ/l=0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 1.0 and 1.5. The values of soil parameters are taken according to the test report and the freezing parameters are commonly used in engineering. The comparison calculation results show that the formula calculation is in good agreement with the numerical calculation results. When the relative thickness is over more than 0.5, the difference between the formula calculation result and the numerical calculation result is rapidly reduced to within 0.5℃ with the development of the frozen soil thickness (relative thickness increase). When the relative thickness is greater than 0.6, the difference between the results is less than 0.2℃. When the relative thickness is 1 or greater, the difference is less than 0.1℃. The accuracy of the average temperature calculation formula is verified by numerical simulation, and the rationality of the formula simplification and correction is also explained. The error calculated by the formula satisfies the requirements of engineering application. © 2019, Editorial Office of Journal of China Coal Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1092 / 1097
页数：5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Hu X., Average temperature calculation for the straight single-row-pipe frozen soil wall, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 32, 4, pp. 778-785, (2010)
  • [2] Hu X., Average temperature model of double-row-pipe frozen soil wall by equivalent trapezoid method, The Second International Symposium on Computational Mechanics (ISCM II) and The Twelfth International Conference on the Enhancement and Promotion of Computational Methods in Engineering and Science (EPMESCXII), pp. 1333-1338, (2009)
  • [3] Hu X., Zhao F., She S., Et al., Equivalent parabolic arch method of average temperature calculation for straight double-row-pipe frozen soil wall, Journal of China Coal Society, 37, 1, pp. 28-32, (2012)
  • [4] Hu X., Ren H., A trapezoidal-parabolic arch superimposed equivalent temperature field model and its average temperature for-mula for triple-row-pipe freezing, Journal of China Coal Society, 39, 1, pp. 78-83, (2014)
  • [5] Chen W., Tang Z., The average temperature in ice wall and the diameter of frozen circle in Panji Coal Field, Journal of China Coal Society, 1, pp. 46-52, (1982)
  • [6] He T., Hu X., Study on adaptability of "CHENG-BING" formula for average temperature of frozen soil wall, Low Temperature Architecture Technology, 31, 5, pp. 77-81, (2009)
  • [7] Wang R., Cao R., FEM analysis of transient freezing temperature field of frozen multi-wall tube, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 24, 2, pp. 181-185, (2002)
  • [8] Hu X., Guo X., Unified formula for average temperature of frozen soil wall by row-piped freezing, Journal of China Coal Society, 41, 4, pp. 850-857, (2016)
  • [9] Бахолдин Б.В., Выбор оптимального режима замораживания грунтов в строительных целях, (1963)
  • [10] Hu X., Wang Y., Analytical solution of three-row-piped frozen temperature field by means of superposition of potential, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 31, 5, pp. 1071-1080, (2012)
12