Structural uncertainty quantification of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes closures for various shock-wave/boundary layer interaction flows

被引:2
作者
Zeng, Fanzhi [1 ]
Zhang, Tianxin [1 ]
Tang, Denggao [1 ]
Li, Jinping [2 ]
Yan, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Aeronaut Sci & Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Air Force Engn Univ, Sch Aeronaut Engn, Xian 710038, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Shock-wave/boundary layer interaction (SWBLI); Turbulence models; Uncertainty analysis; Eigenspace perturbation; Anisotropy; TURBULENT-BOUNDARY-LAYER; MODEL-FORM UNCERTAINTIES; SIMULATIONS; CALIBRATION; PREDICTION; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cja.2023.09.029
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of Shock-Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction (SWBLI) flows has been a persistent challenge for linear eddy viscosity models. A major limitation lies in the isotropic representation of the Reynolds stress, as assumed under the Boussinesq approximation. Recent studies have shown promise in improving the prediction capability for incompressible separation flows by perturbing the Reynolds -stress anisotropy tensor. However, it remains uncertain whether this approach is effective for SWBLI flows, which involve compressibility and discontinuity. To address this issue, this study systematically quantifies the structural uncertainty of the anisotropy for oblique SWBLI flows. The eigenspace perturbation method is applied to perturb the anisotropy tensor predicted by the Menter Shear-Stress Transport (SST) model and reveal the impacts of anisotropy on the prediction of quantities of interest, such as separation and reattachment positions, wall static pressure, skin friction, and heat flux. The results demonstrate the potential and reveal the challenges of eigenspace perturbation in improving the SST model. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of turbulent characteristics is performed to identify the source of uncertainty. The findings indicate that eigenspace perturbation primarily affects turbulent shear stress, while the prediction error of the SST model is more related to turbulent kinetic energy. (c) 2023 Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 48
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Shock wave-turbulence interactions
    Andreopoulos, Y
    Agui, JH
    Briassulis, G
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2000, 32 : 309 - 345
  • [2] Mechanism and Performance Differences between the SSG/LRR-ω and SST Turbulence Models in Separated Flows
    Bai, Ruijie
    Li, Jinping
    Zeng, Fanzhi
    Yan, Chao
    [J]. AEROSPACE, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [3] Presentation of anisotropy properties of turbulence, invariants versus eigenvalue approaches
    Banerjee, S.
    Krahl, R.
    Durst, F.
    Zenger, Ch.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TURBULENCE, 2007, 8 (32): : 1 - 27
  • [4] Benek J, 2010, Report No.:AIAA-2010-4825
  • [5] Bush RH, 2019, Report No.: AIAA-2019-0317
  • [6] CFL3D, Ver. 6.7 Internet
  • [7] Quantification of Reynolds-averaged-Navier-Stokes model-form uncertainty in transitional boundary layer and airfoil flows
    Chu, Minghan
    Wu, Xiaohua
    Rival, David E.
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2022, 34 (10)
  • [8] DeBonis JR, 2012, AIAA J, V50, P891, DOI [10.2514/1.J051341, 10.2514/1.J051.341]
  • [9] Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data
    Duraisamy, Karthik
    Iaccarino, Gianluca
    Xiao, Heng
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 51, 2019, 51 : 357 - 377
  • [10] Some Recent Developments in Turbulence Closure Modeling
    Durbin, Paul A.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 50, 2018, 50 : 77 - 103