Third-party mediation based bilateral multi-issue automated negotiation model

被引：0
|
作者：
Qiao J. [1 ]
Sun N. [1 ]
Liu M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
来源：
Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice | 2022年 / 42卷 / 05期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Automated negotiation model; Bilateral multi-issue; Fairness-first and efficiency-second; Third-party mediation;
D O I：
10.12011/SETP2020-0944
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
A genetic algorithm based bilateral multi-issue automated negotiation model with a third-party mediator agent, a L-K type synchronous offer protocol, a fairness-first and efficiency-second evaluation criterion C5, as well as an elite, a preferential and a random offer choice method is proposed. The experimental results show that: The model can be used to obtain a win-win negotiation result under the condition of private information; C5 fully reflects the negotiation principle of fairness-first and efficiencysecond, and it is easy to find Nash solution that fully reflects the principle by using this criterion; L and K are the key factors that affect the negotiation result, when L and K are small but valued appropriately, the elite offer choice method is the best offer choice method; Increasing both L and K can improve the negotiation result, and they play a complementary role with each other; When L is large enough, the negotiation results will no longer be affected by other factors, and Nash equilibrium offer will be the unique closed offer. © 2022, Editorial Board of Journal of Systems Engineering Society of China. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1366 / 1377
页数：11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Raiffa H., The art and science of negotiation, (1982)
  • [2] Dzeng R J, Lin Y C., Intelligent agents for supporting construction procurement negotiation, Expert Systems with Applications, 27, 1, pp. 107-119, (2004)
  • [3] John F, Nash J., The bargaining problem, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 18, 2, pp. 155-162, (1950)
  • [4] Rubin J Z, Brown B R., The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation, (2013)
  • [5] Osborne M J, Rubinstein A., Bargaining and markets (economic theory, econometrics, and mathematical economics), (1990)
  • [6] Ehtamo H, Hmlinen R P, Heiskanen P, Et al., Generating pareto solutions in a two-party setting: Constraint proposal methods, Management Science, 45, 12, pp. 1697-1709, (1999)
  • [7] Choi S, Messinger P R., The role of fairness in competitive supply chain relationships: An experimental study, European Journal of Operational Research, 251, 3, pp. 798-813, (2016)
  • [8] Trager R F, Vavreck L., The political costs of crisis bargaining: Presidential rhetoric and the role of party, American Journal of Political Science, 55, 3, pp. 526-545, (2011)
  • [9] Faratin P, Sierra C, Jennings N R., Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations, Artificial Intelligence, 142, 2, pp. 205-237, (2002)
  • [10] Hu X P, Cheng Q, Xu Z C., Review of E-commerce negotiation models, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 29, 10, pp. 1650-1654, (2007)
12345