Effects of multimodal explanations for autonomous driving on driving performance, cognitive load, expertise, confidence, and trust

被引:6
作者
Kaufman, Robert [1 ]
Costa, Jean [2 ]
Kimani, Everlyne [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Toyota Res Inst, Los Altos, CA 94022 USA
关键词
SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-62052-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Advances in autonomous driving provide an opportunity for AI-assisted driving instruction that directly addresses the critical need for human driving improvement. How should an AI instructor convey information to promote learning? In a pre-post experiment (n = 41), we tested the impact of an AI Coach's explanatory communications modeled after performance driving expert instructions. Participants were divided into four (4) groups to assess two (2) dimensions of the AI coach's explanations: information type ('what' and 'why'-type explanations) and presentation modality (auditory and visual). We compare how different explanatory techniques impact driving performance, cognitive load, confidence, expertise, and trust via observational learning. Through interview, we delineate participant learning processes. Results show AI coaching can effectively teach performance driving skills to novices. We find the type and modality of information influences performance outcomes. Differences in how successfully participants learned are attributed to how information directs attention, mitigates uncertainty, and influences overload experienced by participants. Results suggest efficient, modality-appropriate explanations should be opted for when designing effective HMI communications that can instruct without overwhelming. Further, results support the need to align communications with human learning and cognitive processes. We provide eight design implications for future autonomous vehicle HMI and AI coach design.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[51]   Multimodal interaction: A review [J].
Turk, Matthew .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2014, 36 :189-195
[52]   Differences between racing and non-racing drivers: A simulator study using eye-tracking [J].
van Leeuwen, Peter M. ;
de Groot, Stefan ;
Happee, Riender ;
de Winter, Joost C. F. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11)
[53]  
Wang DD, 2019, CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, DOI [10.1145/3290605.3300831, 10.1109/icocn.2019.8934212]
[54]   IMMEDIATE PERCEPTUAL RESPONSE TO INTERSENSORY DISCREPANCY [J].
WELCH, RB ;
WARREN, DH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1980, 88 (03) :638-667
[55]  
Wickens C.D., 1991, Multiple-task performance, P3
[56]   I Drive - You Trust: Explaining Driving Behavior Of Autonomous Cars [J].
Wiegand, Gesa ;
Schmidmaier, Matthias ;
Weber, Thomas ;
Liu, Yuanting ;
Hussmann, Heinrich .
CHI EA '19 EXTENDED ABSTRACTS: EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
[57]  
Wintersberger Philipp., 2016, Mensch und Computer 2016-Workshopband
[58]  
Xiong Y. etal, 2010, Racing line optimization
[59]   The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation [J].
Yerkes, RM ;
Dodson, JD .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGY, 1908, 18 (05) :459-482
[60]   The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis [J].
Zheng, Lanqin ;
Niu, Jiayu ;
Zhong, Lu ;
Gyasi, Juliana Fosua .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 31 (09) :5650-5664