A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Models for Time-to-Event Outcome Applied in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction

被引:6
作者
Teshale, Achamyeleh Birhanu [1 ,4 ]
Htun, Htet Lin [1 ]
Vered, Mor [2 ]
Owen, Alice J. [1 ]
Freak-Poli, Rosanne [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Dept Data Sci & AI, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Dept Med, Stroke & Ageing Res,Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Gondar, Inst Publ Hlth, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Gondar, Ethiopia
关键词
Cardiovascular Disease; Prediction; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Artificial Intelligence;
D O I
10.1007/s10916-024-02087-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) based predictive models for early detection of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are increasingly being utilised. However, AI based risk prediction models that account for right-censored data have been overlooked. This systematic review (PROSPERO protocol CRD42023492655) includes 33 studies that utilised machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for survival outcome in CVD prediction. We provided details on the employed ML and DL models, eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques, and type of included variables, with a focus on social determinants of health (SDoH) and gender-stratification. Approximately half of the studies were published in 2023 with the majority from the United States. Random Survival Forest (RSF), Survival Gradient Boosting models, and Penalised Cox models were the most frequently employed ML models. DeepSurv was the most frequently employed DL model. DL models were better at predicting CVD outcomes than ML models. Permutation-based feature importance and Shapley values were the most utilised XAI methods for explaining AI models. Moreover, only one in five studies performed gender-stratification analysis and very few incorporate the wide range of SDoH factors in their prediction model. In conclusion, the evidence indicates that RSF and DeepSurv models are currently the optimal models for predicting CVD outcomes. This study also highlights the better predictive ability of DL survival models, compared to ML models. Future research should ensure the appropriate interpretation of AI models, accounting for SDoH, and gender stratification, as gender plays a significant role in CVD occurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Artificial Intelligence for Infectious Disease Prediction and Prevention: A Comprehensive Review [J].
Melchane, Selestine ;
Elmir, Youssef ;
Kacimi, Farid ;
Boubchir, Larbi .
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS SAPIENTIAE INFORMATICA, 2024, 16 (02) :160-197
[32]   Stock Market Prediction Techniques Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review [J].
Chaudhari, Chandravesh ;
Purswani, Geetanjali .
THIRD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, CIS 2022, VOL 1, 2023, 608 :219-233
[33]   Artificial Intelligence and Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Models [J].
Issaiy, Mahbod ;
Zarei, Diana ;
Saghazadeh, Amene .
WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2023, 18 (01)
[34]   Predictive performance of machine learning compared to statistical methods in time-to-event analysis of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review protocol [J].
Suliman, Abubaker ;
Masud, Mohammad ;
Serhani, Mohamed Adel ;
Abdullahi, Aminu S. ;
Oulhaj, Abderrahim .
BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04)
[35]   Artificial Intelligence Models and Employee Lifecycle Management: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Nosratabadi, Saeed ;
Zahed, Roya Khayer ;
Ponkratov, Vadim Vitalievich ;
Kostyrin, Evgeniy Vyacheslavovich .
ORGANIZACIJA, 2022, 55 (03) :181-198
[36]   Identifying Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Adults with Explainable Artificial Intelligence [J].
Kirboga, Kevser Kubra ;
Kucuksille, Ecir Ugur .
ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 27 (11) :657-663
[37]   Artificial intelligence for treatment planning and soft tissue outcome prediction of orthognathic treatment: A systematic review [J].
Salazar, Daisy ;
Rossouw, Paul Emile ;
Javed, Fawad ;
Michelogiannakis, Dimitrios .
JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 51 (02) :107-119
[38]   Explainable artificial intelligence in breast cancer detection and risk prediction: A systematic scoping review [J].
Ghasemi, Amirehsan ;
Hashtarkhani, Soheil ;
Schwartz, David L. ;
Shaban-Nejad, Arash .
CANCER INNOVATION, 2024, 3 (05)
[39]   Prediction models using artificial intelligence and longitudinal data from electronic health records: a systematic methodological review [J].
Carrasco-Ribelles, Lucia A. ;
Llanes-Jurado, Jose ;
Gallego-Moll, Carlos ;
Cabrera-Bean, Margarita ;
Monteagudo-Zaragoza, Monica ;
Violan, Concepcion ;
Zabaleta-del-Olmo, Edurne .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2023, 30 (12) :2072-2082
[40]   Artificial intelligence based prediction models for individuals at risk of multiple diabetic complications: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Gosak, Lucija ;
Martinovic, Kristina ;
Lorber, Mateja ;
Stiglic, Gregor .
JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (08) :3765-3776