A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Models for Time-to-Event Outcome Applied in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction

被引:6
作者
Teshale, Achamyeleh Birhanu [1 ,4 ]
Htun, Htet Lin [1 ]
Vered, Mor [2 ]
Owen, Alice J. [1 ]
Freak-Poli, Rosanne [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Dept Data Sci & AI, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Dept Med, Stroke & Ageing Res,Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Gondar, Inst Publ Hlth, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Gondar, Ethiopia
关键词
Cardiovascular Disease; Prediction; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Artificial Intelligence;
D O I
10.1007/s10916-024-02087-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) based predictive models for early detection of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are increasingly being utilised. However, AI based risk prediction models that account for right-censored data have been overlooked. This systematic review (PROSPERO protocol CRD42023492655) includes 33 studies that utilised machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for survival outcome in CVD prediction. We provided details on the employed ML and DL models, eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques, and type of included variables, with a focus on social determinants of health (SDoH) and gender-stratification. Approximately half of the studies were published in 2023 with the majority from the United States. Random Survival Forest (RSF), Survival Gradient Boosting models, and Penalised Cox models were the most frequently employed ML models. DeepSurv was the most frequently employed DL model. DL models were better at predicting CVD outcomes than ML models. Permutation-based feature importance and Shapley values were the most utilised XAI methods for explaining AI models. Moreover, only one in five studies performed gender-stratification analysis and very few incorporate the wide range of SDoH factors in their prediction model. In conclusion, the evidence indicates that RSF and DeepSurv models are currently the optimal models for predicting CVD outcomes. This study also highlights the better predictive ability of DL survival models, compared to ML models. Future research should ensure the appropriate interpretation of AI models, accounting for SDoH, and gender stratification, as gender plays a significant role in CVD occurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Artificial intelligence models in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review [J].
Nazar, Wojciech ;
Szymanowicz, Stanislaw ;
Nazar, Krzysztof ;
Kaufmann, Damian ;
Wabich, Elzbieta ;
Braun-Dullaeus, Ruediger ;
Danilowicz-Szymanowicz, Ludmila .
HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2024, 29 (01) :133-150
[22]   A time-to-event analysis on air pollutants with the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 84 cohort studies [J].
Pranata, Raymond ;
Vania, Rachel ;
Tondas, Alexander Edo ;
Setianto, Budhi ;
Santoso, Anwar .
JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (02) :102-115
[23]   Artificial Intelligence of Things Applied to Assistive Technology: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
de Freitas, Mauricio Pasetto ;
Piai, Vinicius Aquino ;
Farias, Ricardo Heffel ;
Fernandes, Anita M. R. ;
de Moraes Rossetto, Anubis Graciela ;
Quietinho Leithardt, Valderi Reis .
SENSORS, 2022, 22 (21)
[24]   Where Is the Artificial Intelligence Applied in Dentistry? Systematic Review and Literature Analysis [J].
Thurzo, Andrej ;
Urbanova, Wanda ;
Novak, Bohuslav ;
Czako, Ladislav ;
Siebert, Tomas ;
Stano, Peter ;
Marekova, Simona ;
Fountoulaki, Georgia ;
Kosnacova, Helena ;
Varga, Ivan .
HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (07)
[25]   Genetic risk scores used in cardiovascular disease prediction models: a systematic review [J].
Yun, Hyunok ;
Noh, Nan Iee ;
Lee, Eun Young .
REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (01)
[26]   Artificial intelligence in retinal imaging for cardiovascular disease prediction: current trends and future directions [J].
Wong, Dragon Y. L. ;
Lam, Mary C. ;
Ran, Anran ;
Cheung, Carol Y. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 33 (05) :440-446
[27]   The predictive performance of artificial intelligence on the outcome of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Yang, Yujia ;
Tang, Li ;
Deng, Yiting ;
Li, Xuzi ;
Luo, Anling ;
Zhang, Zhao ;
He, Li ;
Zhu, Cairong ;
Zhou, Muke .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
[28]   Artificial Intelligence Pipeline for Risk Prediction in Cardiovascular Imaging [J].
Ordovas, Karen G. ;
Seo, Youngho .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2020, 13 (02)
[29]   Artificial intelligence for cardiovascular disease risk assessment in personalised framework: a scoping review [J].
Singh, Manasvi ;
Kumar, Ashish ;
Khanna, Narendra N. ;
Laird, John R. ;
Nicolaides, Andrew ;
Faa, Gavino ;
Johri, Amer M. ;
Mantella, Laura E. ;
Fernandes, Jose Fernandes E. ;
Teji, Jagjit S. ;
Singh, Narpinder ;
Fouda, Mostafa M. ;
Singh, Rajesh ;
Sharma, Aditya ;
Kitas, George ;
Rathore, Vijay ;
Singh, Inder M. ;
Tadepalli, Kalyan ;
Al-Maini, Mustafa ;
Isenovic, Esma R. ;
Chaturvedi, Seemant ;
Garg, Deepak ;
Paraskevas, Kosmas I. ;
Mikhailidis, Dimitri P. ;
Viswanathan, Vijay ;
Kalra, Manudeep K. ;
Ruzsa, Zoltan ;
Saba, Luca ;
Laine, Andrew F. ;
Bhatt, Deepak L. ;
Suri, Jasjit S. .
ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2024, 73
[30]   Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches) [J].
Park, Seo Young ;
Park, Ji Eun ;
Kim, Hyungjin ;
Park, Seong Ho .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (10) :1697-1707