A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Models for Time-to-Event Outcome Applied in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction

被引:4
作者
Teshale, Achamyeleh Birhanu [1 ,4 ]
Htun, Htet Lin [1 ]
Vered, Mor [2 ]
Owen, Alice J. [1 ]
Freak-Poli, Rosanne [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Dept Data Sci & AI, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Dept Med, Stroke & Ageing Res,Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Gondar, Inst Publ Hlth, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Gondar, Ethiopia
关键词
Cardiovascular Disease; Prediction; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Artificial Intelligence;
D O I
10.1007/s10916-024-02087-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) based predictive models for early detection of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are increasingly being utilised. However, AI based risk prediction models that account for right-censored data have been overlooked. This systematic review (PROSPERO protocol CRD42023492655) includes 33 studies that utilised machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for survival outcome in CVD prediction. We provided details on the employed ML and DL models, eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques, and type of included variables, with a focus on social determinants of health (SDoH) and gender-stratification. Approximately half of the studies were published in 2023 with the majority from the United States. Random Survival Forest (RSF), Survival Gradient Boosting models, and Penalised Cox models were the most frequently employed ML models. DeepSurv was the most frequently employed DL model. DL models were better at predicting CVD outcomes than ML models. Permutation-based feature importance and Shapley values were the most utilised XAI methods for explaining AI models. Moreover, only one in five studies performed gender-stratification analysis and very few incorporate the wide range of SDoH factors in their prediction model. In conclusion, the evidence indicates that RSF and DeepSurv models are currently the optimal models for predicting CVD outcomes. This study also highlights the better predictive ability of DL survival models, compared to ML models. Future research should ensure the appropriate interpretation of AI models, accounting for SDoH, and gender stratification, as gender plays a significant role in CVD occurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A time-to-event analysis on air pollutants with the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 84 cohort studies
    Pranata, Raymond
    Vania, Rachel
    Tondas, Alexander Edo
    Setianto, Budhi
    Santoso, Anwar
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (02) : 102 - 115
  • [22] Artificial Intelligence of Things Applied to Assistive Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
    de Freitas, Mauricio Pasetto
    Piai, Vinicius Aquino
    Farias, Ricardo Heffel
    Fernandes, Anita M. R.
    de Moraes Rossetto, Anubis Graciela
    Quietinho Leithardt, Valderi Reis
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (21)
  • [23] Where Is the Artificial Intelligence Applied in Dentistry? Systematic Review and Literature Analysis
    Thurzo, Andrej
    Urbanova, Wanda
    Novak, Bohuslav
    Czako, Ladislav
    Siebert, Tomas
    Stano, Peter
    Marekova, Simona
    Fountoulaki, Georgia
    Kosnacova, Helena
    Varga, Ivan
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [24] Artificial intelligence in retinal imaging for cardiovascular disease prediction: current trends and future directions
    Wong, Dragon Y. L.
    Lam, Mary C.
    Ran, Anran
    Cheung, Carol Y.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 33 (05) : 440 - 446
  • [25] Genetic risk scores used in cardiovascular disease prediction models: a systematic review
    Yun, Hyunok
    Noh, Nan Iee
    Lee, Eun Young
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [26] The predictive performance of artificial intelligence on the outcome of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yujia
    Tang, Li
    Deng, Yiting
    Li, Xuzi
    Luo, Anling
    Zhang, Zhao
    He, Li
    Zhu, Cairong
    Zhou, Muke
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [27] Artificial Intelligence Pipeline for Risk Prediction in Cardiovascular Imaging
    Ordovas, Karen G.
    Seo, Youngho
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2020, 13 (02)
  • [28] Artificial intelligence for cardiovascular disease risk assessment in personalised framework: a scoping review
    Singh, Manasvi
    Kumar, Ashish
    Khanna, Narendra N.
    Laird, John R.
    Nicolaides, Andrew
    Faa, Gavino
    Johri, Amer M.
    Mantella, Laura E.
    Fernandes, Jose Fernandes E.
    Teji, Jagjit S.
    Singh, Narpinder
    Fouda, Mostafa M.
    Singh, Rajesh
    Sharma, Aditya
    Kitas, George
    Rathore, Vijay
    Singh, Inder M.
    Tadepalli, Kalyan
    Al-Maini, Mustafa
    Isenovic, Esma R.
    Chaturvedi, Seemant
    Garg, Deepak
    Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
    Mikhailidis, Dimitri P.
    Viswanathan, Vijay
    Kalra, Manudeep K.
    Ruzsa, Zoltan
    Saba, Luca
    Laine, Andrew F.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Suri, Jasjit S.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2024, 73
  • [29] Stock Market Prediction Techniques Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
    Chaudhari, Chandravesh
    Purswani, Geetanjali
    THIRD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, CIS 2022, VOL 1, 2023, 608 : 219 - 233
  • [30] Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches)
    Park, Seo Young
    Park, Ji Eun
    Kim, Hyungjin
    Park, Seong Ho
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (10) : 1697 - 1707