A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Models for Time-to-Event Outcome Applied in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction

被引:4
作者
Teshale, Achamyeleh Birhanu [1 ,4 ]
Htun, Htet Lin [1 ]
Vered, Mor [2 ]
Owen, Alice J. [1 ]
Freak-Poli, Rosanne [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Dept Data Sci & AI, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Dept Med, Stroke & Ageing Res,Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Gondar, Inst Publ Hlth, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Gondar, Ethiopia
关键词
Cardiovascular Disease; Prediction; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Artificial Intelligence;
D O I
10.1007/s10916-024-02087-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) based predictive models for early detection of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are increasingly being utilised. However, AI based risk prediction models that account for right-censored data have been overlooked. This systematic review (PROSPERO protocol CRD42023492655) includes 33 studies that utilised machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for survival outcome in CVD prediction. We provided details on the employed ML and DL models, eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques, and type of included variables, with a focus on social determinants of health (SDoH) and gender-stratification. Approximately half of the studies were published in 2023 with the majority from the United States. Random Survival Forest (RSF), Survival Gradient Boosting models, and Penalised Cox models were the most frequently employed ML models. DeepSurv was the most frequently employed DL model. DL models were better at predicting CVD outcomes than ML models. Permutation-based feature importance and Shapley values were the most utilised XAI methods for explaining AI models. Moreover, only one in five studies performed gender-stratification analysis and very few incorporate the wide range of SDoH factors in their prediction model. In conclusion, the evidence indicates that RSF and DeepSurv models are currently the optimal models for predicting CVD outcomes. This study also highlights the better predictive ability of DL survival models, compared to ML models. Future research should ensure the appropriate interpretation of AI models, accounting for SDoH, and gender stratification, as gender plays a significant role in CVD occurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A systematic review on artificial intelligence models applied to prediction in finance [J].
Hijazi, Otman ;
Tikito, Kawtar ;
Ouazzani-Touhami, Khadija .
2023 IEEE 13TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE, CCWC, 2023, :183-188
[2]   Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review [J].
Cai, Yue ;
Cai, Yu-Qing ;
Tang, Li-Ying ;
Wang, Yi-Han ;
Gong, Mengchun ;
Jing, Tian-Ci ;
Li, Hui-Jun ;
Li-Ling, Jesse ;
Hu, Wei ;
Yin, Zhihua ;
Gong, Da-Xin ;
Zhang, Guang-Wei .
BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01)
[3]   Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review [J].
Yue Cai ;
Yu-Qing Cai ;
Li-Ying Tang ;
Yi-Han Wang ;
Mengchun Gong ;
Tian-Ci Jing ;
Hui-Jun Li ;
Jesse Li-Ling ;
Wei Hu ;
Zhihua Yin ;
Da-Xin Gong ;
Guang-Wei Zhang .
BMC Medicine, 22
[4]   Artificial intelligence improves risk prediction in cardiovascular disease [J].
Teshale, Achamyeleh Birhanu ;
Htun, Htet Lin ;
Vered, Mor ;
Owen, Alice J. ;
Ryan, Joanne ;
Tonkin, Andrew ;
Freak-Poli, Rosanne .
GEROSCIENCE, 2024,
[5]   Transforming Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: A Review of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Innovations [J].
Kasartzian, Dimitrios-Ioannis ;
Tsiampalis, Thomas .
LIFE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (01)
[6]   Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models in the Prediction of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review [J].
Polizzi, A. ;
Quinzi, V. ;
Lo Giudice, A. ;
Marzo, G. ;
Leonardi, R. ;
Isola, G. .
JDR CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 9 (04) :312-324
[7]   Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-based prediction models for cardiovascular disease [J].
van Smeden, Maarten ;
Heinze, Georg ;
Van Calster, Ben ;
Asselbergs, Folkert W. ;
Vardas, Panos E. ;
Bruining, Nico ;
de Jaegere, Peter ;
Moore, Jason H. ;
Denaxas, Spiros ;
Boulesteix, Anne-Laure ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (31) :2921-2930
[8]   Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Stratification in Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Atherosclerosis Pathway and Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Systematic Review [J].
Suri, Jasjit S. ;
Paul, Sudip ;
Maindarkar, Maheshrao A. ;
Puvvula, Anudeep ;
Saxena, Sanjay ;
Saba, Luca ;
Turk, Monika ;
Laird, John R. ;
Khanna, Narendra N. ;
Viskovic, Klaudija ;
Singh, Inder M. ;
Kalra, Mannudeep ;
Krishnan, Padukode R. ;
Johri, Amer ;
Paraskevas, Kosmas I. .
METABOLITES, 2022, 12 (04)
[9]   Artificial intelligence applied to musculoskeletal oncology: a systematic review [J].
Matthew D. Li ;
Syed Rakin Ahmed ;
Edwin Choy ;
Santiago A. Lozano-Calderon ;
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer ;
Connie Y. Chang .
Skeletal Radiology, 2022, 51 :245-256
[10]   Artificial intelligence applied to musculoskeletal oncology: a systematic review [J].
Li, Matthew D. ;
Ahmed, Syed Rakin ;
Choy, Edwin ;
Lozano-Calderon, Santiago A. ;
Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree ;
Chang, Connie Y. .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (02) :245-256