A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Models for Time-to-Event Outcome Applied in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction

被引:4
|
作者
Teshale, Achamyeleh Birhanu [1 ,4 ]
Htun, Htet Lin [1 ]
Vered, Mor [2 ]
Owen, Alice J. [1 ]
Freak-Poli, Rosanne [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Dept Data Sci & AI, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Dept Med, Stroke & Ageing Res,Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Gondar, Inst Publ Hlth, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Gondar, Ethiopia
关键词
Cardiovascular Disease; Prediction; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Artificial Intelligence;
D O I
10.1007/s10916-024-02087-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) based predictive models for early detection of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are increasingly being utilised. However, AI based risk prediction models that account for right-censored data have been overlooked. This systematic review (PROSPERO protocol CRD42023492655) includes 33 studies that utilised machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for survival outcome in CVD prediction. We provided details on the employed ML and DL models, eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques, and type of included variables, with a focus on social determinants of health (SDoH) and gender-stratification. Approximately half of the studies were published in 2023 with the majority from the United States. Random Survival Forest (RSF), Survival Gradient Boosting models, and Penalised Cox models were the most frequently employed ML models. DeepSurv was the most frequently employed DL model. DL models were better at predicting CVD outcomes than ML models. Permutation-based feature importance and Shapley values were the most utilised XAI methods for explaining AI models. Moreover, only one in five studies performed gender-stratification analysis and very few incorporate the wide range of SDoH factors in their prediction model. In conclusion, the evidence indicates that RSF and DeepSurv models are currently the optimal models for predicting CVD outcomes. This study also highlights the better predictive ability of DL survival models, compared to ML models. Future research should ensure the appropriate interpretation of AI models, accounting for SDoH, and gender stratification, as gender plays a significant role in CVD occurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review on artificial intelligence models applied to prediction in finance
    Hijazi, Otman
    Tikito, Kawtar
    Ouazzani-Touhami, Khadija
    2023 IEEE 13TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE, CCWC, 2023, : 183 - 188
  • [2] Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review
    Yue Cai
    Yu-Qing Cai
    Li-Ying Tang
    Yi-Han Wang
    Mengchun Gong
    Tian-Ci Jing
    Hui-Jun Li
    Jesse Li-Ling
    Wei Hu
    Zhihua Yin
    Da-Xin Gong
    Guang-Wei Zhang
    BMC Medicine, 22
  • [3] Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review
    Cai, Yue
    Cai, Yu-Qing
    Tang, Li-Ying
    Wang, Yi-Han
    Gong, Mengchun
    Jing, Tian-Ci
    Li, Hui-Jun
    Li-Ling, Jesse
    Hu, Wei
    Yin, Zhihua
    Gong, Da-Xin
    Zhang, Guang-Wei
    BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [4] Artificial intelligence improves risk prediction in cardiovascular disease
    Teshale, Achamyeleh Birhanu
    Htun, Htet Lin
    Vered, Mor
    Owen, Alice J.
    Ryan, Joanne
    Tonkin, Andrew
    Freak-Poli, Rosanne
    GEROSCIENCE, 2024,
  • [5] Transforming Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: A Review of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Innovations
    Kasartzian, Dimitrios-Ioannis
    Tsiampalis, Thomas
    LIFE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [6] Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Models in the Prediction of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review
    Polizzi, A.
    Quinzi, V.
    Lo Giudice, A.
    Marzo, G.
    Leonardi, R.
    Isola, G.
    JDR CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 9 (04) : 312 - 324
  • [7] Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-based prediction models for cardiovascular disease
    van Smeden, Maarten
    Heinze, Georg
    Van Calster, Ben
    Asselbergs, Folkert W.
    Vardas, Panos E.
    Bruining, Nico
    de Jaegere, Peter
    Moore, Jason H.
    Denaxas, Spiros
    Boulesteix, Anne-Laure
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (31) : 2921 - 2930
  • [8] Artificial intelligence applied to musculoskeletal oncology: a systematic review
    Li, Matthew D.
    Ahmed, Syed Rakin
    Choy, Edwin
    Lozano-Calderon, Santiago A.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Chang, Connie Y.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (02) : 245 - 256
  • [9] Artificial intelligence applied to musculoskeletal oncology: a systematic review
    Matthew D. Li
    Syed Rakin Ahmed
    Edwin Choy
    Santiago A. Lozano-Calderon
    Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
    Connie Y. Chang
    Skeletal Radiology, 2022, 51 : 245 - 256
  • [10] Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Stratification in Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Atherosclerosis Pathway and Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Systematic Review
    Suri, Jasjit S.
    Paul, Sudip
    Maindarkar, Maheshrao A.
    Puvvula, Anudeep
    Saxena, Sanjay
    Saba, Luca
    Turk, Monika
    Laird, John R.
    Khanna, Narendra N.
    Viskovic, Klaudija
    Singh, Inder M.
    Kalra, Mannudeep
    Krishnan, Padukode R.
    Johri, Amer
    Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
    METABOLITES, 2022, 12 (04)