An artificial neural network based approach for predicting the proton beam spot dosimetric characteristics of a pencil beam scanning technique

被引:1
|
作者
Ranjith, C. P. [1 ,2 ]
Krishnan, Mayakannan [1 ]
Raveendran, Vysakh [2 ]
Chaudhari, Lalit [2 ]
Laskar, Siddhartha [2 ]
机构
[1] DY Patil Educ Soc Deemed Be Univ, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Adv Ctr Treatment Res & Educ Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
machine learning; pencil beam scanning; quality assurance; log file; proton therapy; HEAD;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad3ce0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Utilising Machine Learning (ML) models to predict dosimetric parameters in pencil beam scanning proton therapy presents a promising and practical approach. The study developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict proton beam spot size and relative positional errors using 9000 proton spot data. The irradiation log files as input variables and corresponding scintillation detector measurements as the label values. The ANN models were developed to predict six variables: spot size in the x-axis, y-axis, major axis, minor axis, and relative positional errors in the x-axis and y-axis. All ANN models used a Multi-layer perception (MLP) network using one input layer, three hidden layers, and one output layer. Model performance was validated using various statistical tools. The log file recorded spot size and relative positional errors, which were compared with scintillator-measured data. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values for the x-spot and y-spot sizes were 0.356 mm and 0.362 mm, respectively. Additionally, the maximum variation for the x-spot relative positional error was 0.910 mm, while for the y-spot, it was 1.610 mm. The ANN models exhibit lower prediction errors. Specifically, the RMSE values for spot size prediction in the x, y, major, and minor axes are 0.053 mm, 0.049 mm, 0.053 mm, and 0.052 mm, respectively. Additionally, the relative spot positional error prediction model for the x and y axes yielded maximum errors of 0.160 mm and 0.170 mm, respectively. The normality of models was validated using the residual histogram and Q-Q plot. The data over fit, and bias were tested using K (k = 5) fold cross-validation, and the maximum RMSE value of the K fold cross-validation among all the six ML models was less than 0.150 mm (R-Square 0.960). All the models showed excellent prediction accuracy. Accurately predicting beam spot size and positional errors enhances efficiency in routine dosimetric checks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A machine learning-based framework for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning using irradiation log-files
    Maes, Dominic
    Bowen, Stephen R.
    Regmi, Rajesh
    Bloch, Charles
    Wong, Tony
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly
    Saini, Jatinder
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 78 : 179 - 186
  • [32] A parameter study of pencil beam proton dose distributions for the treatment of ocular melanoma utilizing spot scanning
    Sutherland K.
    Miyajima S.
    Date H.
    Shirato H.
    Ishikawa M.
    Murakami M.
    Yamagiwa M.
    Bolton P.
    Tajima T.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2010, 3 (1) : 16 - 22
  • [33] Dosimetric Impact of intra- and inter-fraction motion in liver pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Nankali, Saber
    Worm, Esben Schjodt
    Thomsen, Jakob Borup
    Stick, Line Bjerregaard
    Hoyer, Morten
    Weber, Britta
    Mortensen, Hanna Rahbek
    Poulsen, Per Rugaard
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4193 - S4196
  • [34] Proton therapy posterior beam approach with pencil beam scanning for esophageal cancerClinical outcome, dosimetry, and feasibilityPosterior-Beam-Protonentherapie mit Pencil Beam Scanning beim ÖsophaguskarzinomKlinische Ergebnisse, Dosimetrie und Durchführbarkeit
    Yue-Can Zeng
    Shilpa Vyas
    Quang Dang
    Lindsay Schultz
    Stephen R. Bowen
    Veena Shankaran
    Farhood Farjah
    Brant K. Oelschlager
    Smith Apisarnthanarax
    Jing Zeng
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2016, 192 : 913 - 921
  • [35] The Applications and Pitfalls of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Synthetic Computed Tomography for Adaptive Evaluation in Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Tsai, Pingfang
    Tseng, Yu-Lun
    Shen, Brian
    Ackerman, Christopher
    Zhai, Huifang A.
    Yu, Francis
    Simone II, Charles B.
    Choi, J. Isabelle
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Kabarriti, Rafi
    Lazarev, Stanislav
    Johnson, Casey L.
    Liu, Jiayi
    Chen, Chin-Cheng
    Lin, Haibo
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (20)
  • [36] Proton pencil beam scanning treatment with feedback based voluntary moderate breath hold
    Wang, Peng
    Tang, Shikui
    Leach, Karla
    Mangona, Victor
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Langen, Katja
    Chang, Chang
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (03) : E10 - E15
  • [37] Implication of spot position error on plan quality and patient safety in pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy
    Yu, Juan
    Beltran, Chris J.
    Herman, Michael G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) : 96 - 103
  • [38] Dosimetric analysis of local failures in skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma following pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Basler, Lucas
    Poel, Robert
    Schroeder, Christina
    Bolsi, Alessandra
    Lomax, Antony
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Weber, Damien C.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [39] Dosimetric analysis of local failures in skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma following pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Lucas Basler
    Robert Poel
    Christina Schröder
    Alessandra Bolsi
    Antony Lomax
    Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
    Matthias Guckenberger
    Damien C. Weber
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [40] Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes
    Kralik, John C.
    Xi, Liwen
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Lin, Liyong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (06): : 41 - 50