An artificial neural network based approach for predicting the proton beam spot dosimetric characteristics of a pencil beam scanning technique

被引:1
|
作者
Ranjith, C. P. [1 ,2 ]
Krishnan, Mayakannan [1 ]
Raveendran, Vysakh [2 ]
Chaudhari, Lalit [2 ]
Laskar, Siddhartha [2 ]
机构
[1] DY Patil Educ Soc Deemed Be Univ, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Adv Ctr Treatment Res & Educ Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
machine learning; pencil beam scanning; quality assurance; log file; proton therapy; HEAD;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad3ce0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Utilising Machine Learning (ML) models to predict dosimetric parameters in pencil beam scanning proton therapy presents a promising and practical approach. The study developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict proton beam spot size and relative positional errors using 9000 proton spot data. The irradiation log files as input variables and corresponding scintillation detector measurements as the label values. The ANN models were developed to predict six variables: spot size in the x-axis, y-axis, major axis, minor axis, and relative positional errors in the x-axis and y-axis. All ANN models used a Multi-layer perception (MLP) network using one input layer, three hidden layers, and one output layer. Model performance was validated using various statistical tools. The log file recorded spot size and relative positional errors, which were compared with scintillator-measured data. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values for the x-spot and y-spot sizes were 0.356 mm and 0.362 mm, respectively. Additionally, the maximum variation for the x-spot relative positional error was 0.910 mm, while for the y-spot, it was 1.610 mm. The ANN models exhibit lower prediction errors. Specifically, the RMSE values for spot size prediction in the x, y, major, and minor axes are 0.053 mm, 0.049 mm, 0.053 mm, and 0.052 mm, respectively. Additionally, the relative spot positional error prediction model for the x and y axes yielded maximum errors of 0.160 mm and 0.170 mm, respectively. The normality of models was validated using the residual histogram and Q-Q plot. The data over fit, and bias were tested using K (k = 5) fold cross-validation, and the maximum RMSE value of the K fold cross-validation among all the six ML models was less than 0.150 mm (R-Square 0.960). All the models showed excellent prediction accuracy. Accurately predicting beam spot size and positional errors enhances efficiency in routine dosimetric checks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Facilitated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Autosegmentation in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Feng, Hongying
    Shan, Jie
    Vargas, Carlos E.
    Keole, Sameer R.
    Rwigema, Jean-Claude M.
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Ding, Yuzhen
    Zhang, Lian
    Hu, Yanle
    Schild, Steven E.
    Wong, William W.
    Vora, Sujay A.
    Shen, Jiajian
    Liu, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2025, 121 (03): : 822 - 831
  • [22] Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results
    Kubeš Jiří
    Vondráček Vladimír
    Andrlik Michal
    Navrátil Matěj
    Sláviková Silvia
    Vítek Pavel
    Dědečková Kateřina
    Prausová Jana
    Ondrová Barbora
    Rotnáglová Eliška
    Lukeš Petr
    Patzelt Matěj
    Grebenyuk Alexander
    Rosina Jozef
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 763 - 769
  • [23] Validating a Monte Carlo approach to absolute dose quality assurance for proton pencil beam scanning
    Winterhalter, C.
    Fura, E.
    Tian, Y.
    Aitkenhead, A.
    Bolsi, A.
    Dieterle, M.
    Fredh, A.
    Meier, G.
    Oxley, D.
    Siewert, D.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A.
    Safai, S.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (17):
  • [24] Development of Optical Fiber Based Measurement System for the Verification of Entrance Dose Map in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam
    Son, Jaeman
    Lee, Se Byeong
    Lim, Youngkyung
    Park, Sung Yong
    Cho, Kwanho
    Yoon, Myonggeun
    Shin, Dongho
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (01):
  • [25] Commissioning dose computation model for proton source in pencil beam scanning therapy by convolution neural networks
    Liu, Yaoying
    Shang, Xuying
    Zhao, Wei
    Li, Nan
    Qu, Baolin
    Zou, Yue
    Le, Xiaoyun
    Zhang, Gaolong
    Xu, Shouping
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (15):
  • [26] Stochastic model for predicting the temporal structure of the plan delivery in a synchrotron-based pencil beam scanning proton therapy system
    Burguete, J.
    Garcia-Cardosa, M.
    Antolin, E.
    Aguilar, B.
    Azcona, J. D.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2025, 226
  • [27] Feasibility study of utilizing XRV-124 scintillation detector for quality assurance of spot profile in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    Samuel, E. James Jebaseelan
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 66 : 15 - 20
  • [28] Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (02):
  • [29] Dosimetric Correlation of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy Using Pencil Beam Scanning
    Huang, Eng-Yen
    Ho, Meng Wei
    Wang, Yu-Ming
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2024, 27 (03) : 187 - 200
  • [30] Proton therapy posterior beam approach with pencil beam scanning for esophageal cancer Clinical outcome, dosimetry, and feasibility
    Zeng, Yue-Can
    Vyas, Shilpa
    Dang, Quang
    Schultz, Lindsay
    Bowen, Stephen R.
    Shankaran, Veena
    Farjah, Farhood
    Oelschlager, Brant K.
    Apisarnthanarax, Smith
    Zeng, Jing
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 (12) : 913 - 921