An artificial neural network based approach for predicting the proton beam spot dosimetric characteristics of a pencil beam scanning technique

被引:1
|
作者
Ranjith, C. P. [1 ,2 ]
Krishnan, Mayakannan [1 ]
Raveendran, Vysakh [2 ]
Chaudhari, Lalit [2 ]
Laskar, Siddhartha [2 ]
机构
[1] DY Patil Educ Soc Deemed Be Univ, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Adv Ctr Treatment Res & Educ Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
machine learning; pencil beam scanning; quality assurance; log file; proton therapy; HEAD;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad3ce0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Utilising Machine Learning (ML) models to predict dosimetric parameters in pencil beam scanning proton therapy presents a promising and practical approach. The study developed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict proton beam spot size and relative positional errors using 9000 proton spot data. The irradiation log files as input variables and corresponding scintillation detector measurements as the label values. The ANN models were developed to predict six variables: spot size in the x-axis, y-axis, major axis, minor axis, and relative positional errors in the x-axis and y-axis. All ANN models used a Multi-layer perception (MLP) network using one input layer, three hidden layers, and one output layer. Model performance was validated using various statistical tools. The log file recorded spot size and relative positional errors, which were compared with scintillator-measured data. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) values for the x-spot and y-spot sizes were 0.356 mm and 0.362 mm, respectively. Additionally, the maximum variation for the x-spot relative positional error was 0.910 mm, while for the y-spot, it was 1.610 mm. The ANN models exhibit lower prediction errors. Specifically, the RMSE values for spot size prediction in the x, y, major, and minor axes are 0.053 mm, 0.049 mm, 0.053 mm, and 0.052 mm, respectively. Additionally, the relative spot positional error prediction model for the x and y axes yielded maximum errors of 0.160 mm and 0.170 mm, respectively. The normality of models was validated using the residual histogram and Q-Q plot. The data over fit, and bias were tested using K (k = 5) fold cross-validation, and the maximum RMSE value of the K fold cross-validation among all the six ML models was less than 0.150 mm (R-Square 0.960). All the models showed excellent prediction accuracy. Accurately predicting beam spot size and positional errors enhances efficiency in routine dosimetric checks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Comparison of Various Spot Placement Techniques in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning
    Rehman, Mahboob ur
    Zeidan, Omar A.
    Willoughby, Twyla
    Meeks, Sanford L.
    Kelly, Patrick
    Erhart, Kevin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2022, 9 (01) : 54 - 63
  • [2] Impact of magnetic field regulation in conjunction with the volumetric repainting technique on the spot positions and beam range in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11): : 124 - 131
  • [3] Spot decomposition in a novel pencil beam scanning proton Computed Tomography
    Zhou, J.
    Li, X.
    Kabolizadeh, P.
    Yang, X.
    Yan, D.
    Stevens, C.
    Liu, T.
    Ding, X.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 10948
  • [4] Dosimetric delivery validation of dynamically collimated pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Nelson, Nicholas P.
    Culberson, Wesley S.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Geoghegan, Theodore J.
    Patwardhan, Kaustubh A.
    Smith, Blake R.
    Flynn, Ryan T.
    Yu, Jen
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Hill, Patrick M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (05):
  • [5] Collimating individual beamlets in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, a dosimetric investigation
    Holmes, Jason
    Shen, Jiajian
    Patel, Samir H.
    Wong, William W.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Bues, Martin
    Liu, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [6] Toward automatic beam angle selection for pencil-beam scanning proton liver treatments: A deep learning-based approach
    Kaderka, Robert
    Liu, Keng-Chi
    Liu, Lawrence
    VanderStraeten, Reynald
    Liu, Tyng-Luh
    Lee, Kuang-Min
    Tu, Yi-Chin Ethan
    MacEwan, Iain
    Simpson, Daniel
    Urbanic, James
    Chang, Chang
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (07) : 4293 - 4304
  • [7] Dosimetric Impact of In-Air Spot Size Variations for Commissioning a Room-Matched Beam Model for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Zhang, Y.
    Giebeler, A.
    Mascia, A.
    Piskulich, F.
    Perles, L.
    Lepage, R.
    Dong, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 112 - +
  • [8] Log file based Monte Carlo calculations for proton pencil beam scanning therapy
    Winterhalter, Carla
    Meier, Gabriel
    Oxley, David
    Weber, Damien C.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Safai, Sairos
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (03):
  • [9] Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Nelson, Nicholas P.
    Culberson, Wesley S.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Geoghegan, Theodore J.
    Patwardhan, Kaustubh A.
    Smith, Blake R.
    Flynn, Ryan T.
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Boland, Thibault
    Hill, Patrick M.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [10] Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results
    Kubes, Jiri
    Vondracek, Vladimir
    Andrlik, Michal
    Navratil, Matej
    Slavikova, Silvia
    Vitek, Pavel
    Dedeckova, Katerina
    Prausova, Jana
    Ondrova, Barbora
    Rotnaglova, Eliska
    Lukes, Petr
    Patzelt, Matej
    Grebenyuk, Alexander
    Rosina, Jozef
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 278 (03) : 763 - 769