Face recognition technology for video surveillance integrated with particle swarm optimization algorithm

被引：1

作者：

Qian Y. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of IFLYTEK Data Science, Chongqing City Vocational College, Yongchuan, Chongqing

来源：

International Journal of Intelligent Networks | 2024年 / 5卷

关键词：

Accuracy; Convergence performance; Face recognition; Feature extraction; LBP; Optimization model; Parametric testing; PSO; SVM; Video surveillance;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijin.2024.02.008

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

With the rapid development of video surveillance technology, face recognition has become an important security and surveillance tool. To improve the accuracy and applicability of face recognition in video surveillance, this study improved the Inertia Weight (IW) and Learning Factor (LF) based on the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm and Local Binary Mode (LBP) were used to optimize the processing. The results showed that the optimal solution could be obtained after 10 iterations, and the recognition accuracy reached 92.3%. When the number of iterations reached 40, the recognition accuracy inertia weight reached 99.7%. The average operating time of the original PSO algorithm and the optimized PSO algorithm was 26.3 s and 24.7 s, respectively. This shows that the optimization algorithm not only improves the recognition accuracy, but also shortens the operation time, and enhances the convergence performance and robustness to varying degrees. The improved model can improve the recognition rate of video surveillance system, indicating that the optimization algorithm has great application potential in the video surveillance face recognition. © 2024 The Author

引用

页码：145 / 153

页数：8

共 23 条

[1] Andrejevic M., Selwyn N., Facial recognition technology in schools: critical questions and concerns, Learn. Media Technol., 45, 2, pp. 115-128, (2020)
[2] Cavazos J.G., Phillips P.J., Castillo C.D., O'Toole A.J., Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: where are we on measuring race bias, IEEE Transac. Biomet. Behav. Ident. Sci., 3, 1, pp. 101-111, (2020)
[3] Kosinski M., Facial recognition technology can exPSOe political orientation from naturalistic facial images, Sci. Rep., 11, 1, pp. 1-7, (2021)
[4] Van Noorden R., The ethical questions that haunt facial-recognition research, Nature, 587, 7834, pp. 354-359, (2020)
[5] Singh R., Agarwal A., Singh M., Nagpal S., Vatsa M., On the robustness of face recognition algorithms against attacks and bias, Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., 34, 9, pp. 13583-13589, (2020)
[6] Jin B., Cruz L., Goncalves N., Pseudo RGB-D face recognition, IEEE Sensor. J., 22, 22, pp. 21780-21794, (2022)
[7] Hariri W., Efficient masked face recognition method during the covid-19 pandemic, Signal Image Video Process., 16, 3, pp. 605-612, (2022)
[8] Kim M., Liu F., Jain A.K., Liu X., Cluster and aggregate: face recognition with large probe set, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 35, pp. 36054-36066, (2022)
[9] Wang X., Zhang S., Wang S., Fu T., Shi H., Mei T., Mis-classified vector guided softmax loss for face recognition, Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., 34, 7, pp. 12241-12248, (2020)
[10] Shakya S., Multi distance face recognition of eye localization with modified Gaussian derivative filter, J. Innov. Image Process., 3, 3, pp. 240-254, (2021)

← 1 2 3 →