Douyin and Bilibili as sources of information on lung cancer in China through assessment and analysis of the content and quality

被引:0
|
作者
Zeng, Fanyi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Weilin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Menghui [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hejin [3 ]
Zhu, Xiaoyi [2 ]
Hu, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Jiangxi Med Coll, Dept Hlth Management Ctr, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Huan Kui Acad, Jiangxi Med Coll, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Jiangxi Med Coll, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Lung cancer; Social media; Short videos; Information quality; Douyin; Bilibili;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-70640-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Lung cancer has emerged as a major global public health concern. With growing public interest in lung cancer, online searches for related information have surged. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the credibility, quality, and value of lung cancer-related videos on digital media platforms remains unexamined. This study aimed to assess the informational quality and content of lung cancer-related videos on Douyin and Bilibili. A total of 200 lung cancer-related videos that met the criteria were selected from Douyin and Bilibili for evaluation and analysis. The first step involved recording and analyzing the basic information provided in the videos. Subsequently, the source and type of content for each video were identified. All videos' educational content and quality were then evaluated using JAMA, GQS, and Modified DISCERN. Douyin videos were found to be more popular in terms of likes, comments, favorites, and shares, whereas Bilibili videos were longer in duration (P < .001). The majority of video content on both platforms comprised lung cancer introductions (31/100, 31%), with medical professionals being the primary source of uploaded videos (Douyin, n = 55, 55%; Bilibili, n = 43, 43%). General users on Douyin scored the lowest on the JAMA scale, whereas for-profit businesses scored the highest (2.50 points). The results indicated that the videos' informational quality was insufficient. Videos from science communications and health professionals were deemed more reliable regarding completeness and content quality compared to videos from other sources. The public should exercise caution and consider the scientific validity when seeking healthcare information on short video platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as sources of information on gastric cancer: assessment and analysis of the content and quality
    Wang, Menghui
    Yao, Nan
    Wang, Jianming
    Chen, Wenjuan
    Ouyang, Yaobin
    Xie, Chuan
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [2] Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as sources of information on gastric cancer: assessment and analysis of the content and quality
    Menghui Wang
    Nan Yao
    Jianming Wang
    Wenjuan Chen
    Yaobin Ouyang
    Chuan Xie
    BMC Public Health, 24
  • [3] yy TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis
    Du, Ren-Chun
    Zhang, Yang
    Wang, Meng-Hui
    Lu, Nong-Hua
    Hu, Yi
    HELICOBACTER, 2023, 28 (05)
  • [4] YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study
    Liu, Zeyang
    Chen, Yiwen
    Lin, Ying
    Ai, Maomao
    Lian, Dongling
    Zhang, Yuanhui
    Shen, Yanxiong
    Yu, Feng
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis
    Yang, Hongwu
    Zhu, Chuangying
    Zhou, Chunyan
    Huang, Ruibin
    Huang, Lipeng
    Chen, Peifen
    Zhu, Shanshan
    Wang, Huanpeng
    Zhu, Chunmin
    JMIR CANCER, 2025, 11
  • [6] Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study
    Zheng, Shusen
    Tong, Xinyu
    Wan, Dalong
    Hu, Chen
    Hu, Qing
    Ke, Qinghong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [7] Quality of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Videos Available on TikTok and Bilibili: Content Analysis
    Niu, Zheyu
    Hao, Yijie
    Yang, Faji
    Jiang, Qirong
    Jiang, Yupeng
    Zhang, Shizhe
    Song, Xie
    Chang, Hong
    Zhou, Xu
    Zhu, Huaqiang
    Gao, Hengjun
    Lu, Jun
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8
  • [8] Quality and educational content of Douyin and TikTok short videos on early screening of rectal cancer
    Li, Lian-Shuo
    Luo, Xiao-Juan
    Shu, Xin-Peng
    Li, Zi-Wei
    Liu, Fei
    Liu, Xu-Rui
    Tong, Yue
    Lv, Quan
    Liu, Xiao-Yu
    Zhang, Wei
    Peng, Dong
    JGH OPEN, 2023, 7 (12): : 936 - 941
  • [9] Assessing the content and quality of GI bleeding information on Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube: a cross-sectional study
    Jingsong Wang
    Bingxi Liu
    Guang Yang
    Yixing Luo
    Nonghua Lv
    Xu Shu
    Zhenhua Zhu
    Linlin Liu
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [10] Lung Cancer Messages on Twitter: Content Analysis and Evaluation
    Sutton, Jeannette
    Vos, Sarah C.
    Olson, Michele K.
    Woods, Chelsea
    Cohen, Elisia
    Ben Gibson, C.
    Phillips, Nolan Edward
    Studts, Jamie L.
    Eberth, Jan M.
    Butts, Carter T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (01) : 210 - 217