Comparison between the diagnostic utility of three-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion recovery (3D FLAIR) and three dimensional double inversion recovery (3D DIR) magnetic resonance sequences in the assessment of overall load of multiple sclerosis lesions in the brain

BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex CNS demyelinating disease. Assessment of MS plaques in specific anatomic locations in the brain was challenging to detect by conventional MRI sequences. So, this study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3D FLAIR (Fluid attenuation inversion recovery), or 3D DIR (Double inversion recovery) sequences to conventional 2D FLAIR and T2 sequences in detecting MS plaques in different anatomic sites, as well as counting the total lesion burden.MethodsA comparative cross-sectional study enrolled 30 MS patients on the basis of McDonald's criteria 2017. All participants underwent a brain MRI study including 3D FLAIR or 3D DIR sequences, conventional 2D FLAIR, and T2 sequences.ResultsNo statistically significant difference between the 3D DIR and 3D FLAIR in total lesion (plaque) burden results; however, when each is compared to the conventional ones, both are superior. 3D FLAIR detected the most significant number of plaques in the periventricular region, followed by 2D FLAIR and T2W sequences, with 3D DIR being the least accurate in this region. Meanwhile, 3D DIR was the most precise and can detect a statistically significant number of cortical plaques compared to the 3D FLAIR and the conventional sequences. No statistically significant results on which sequence is best in regard to infratentorial plaque detection.Conclusion3D FLAIR and 3D DIR were superior to 2D FLAIR and T2 sequences in detecting overall lesion burden in MS. Moreover, the 3D DIR sequence was the most precise in the detection of the cortical plaques.