Going virtual: mixed methods evaluation of online versus in-person learning in the NIH mixed methods research training program retreat

被引:0
作者
Gallo, Joseph J. [1 ]
Murray, Sarah M. [1 ]
Creswell, John W. [2 ]
Deutsch, Charles [3 ]
Guetterman, Timothy C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Research training; Mixed methods research; Research capacity building; Online education; Teaching methods;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-05877-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite the central role of mixed methods in health research, studies evaluating online methods training in the health sciences are nonexistent. The focused goal was to evaluate online training by comparing the self-rated skills of scholars who experienced an in-person retreat to scholars in an online retreat in specific domains of mixed methods research for the health sciences from 2015-2023.MethodsThe authors administered a scholar Mixed Methods Skills Self-Assessment instrument based on an educational competency scale that included domains on: "research questions," "design/approach," "sampling," "analysis," and "dissemination" to participants of the Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences (MMRTP). Self-ratings on confidence on domains were compared before and after retreat participation within cohorts who attended in person (n = 73) or online (n = 57) as well as comparing across in-person to online cohorts. Responses to open-ended questions about experiences with the retreat were analyzed.ResultsScholars in an interactive program to improve mixed methods skills reported significantly increased confidence in ability to define or explain concepts and in ability to apply the concepts to practical problems, whether the program was attended in-person or synchronously online. Scholars in the online retreat had self-rated skill improvements as good or better than scholars who participated in person. With the possible exception of networking, scholars found the online format was associated with advantages such as accessibility and reduced burden of travel and finding childcare. No differences in difficulty of learning concepts was described.ConclusionsKeeping in mind that the retreat is only one component of the MMRTP, this study provides evidence that mixed methods training online was associated with the same increases in self-rated skills as persons attending online and can be a key component to increasing the capacity for mixed methods research in the health sciences.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Albright K, 2013, ACAD PEDIATR, V13, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.acap.2013.06.010
  • [2] Applying mixed methods to pilot feasibility studies to inform intervention trials
    Aschbrenner, Kelly A.
    Kruse, Gina
    Gallo, Joseph J.
    Clark, Vicki L. Plano
    [J]. PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [3] Barche Apurv, 2022, F1000Res, V11, P979, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.123582.1
  • [4] A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews
    Boeije, H
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2002, 36 (04) : 391 - 409
  • [5] Chan Alex, 2021, Can Med Educ J, V12, P65, DOI 10.36834/cmej.71975
  • [6] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  • [7] Federal Funding for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences in the United States: Recent Trends
    Coyle, Caitlin E.
    Schulman-Green, Dena
    Feder, Shelli
    Toraman, Sinem
    Prust, Margaret L.
    Clark, Vicki L. Plano
    Curry, Leslie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (03) : 305 - 324
  • [8] Creswell J., 2018, Designing and conducting mixed methods research, V3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1753-6405.2007.00096.X
  • [9] Reflections on the MMIRA The Future of Mixed Methods Task Force Report
    Creswell, John W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (03) : 215 - 219
  • [10] DeVellis R. F., 2012, Scale development: Theory and applications, V3rd