Unicondylar knee arthroplasty demonstrating a significant increased risk for aseptic revisions compared to unconstrained and constrained total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of aseptic revisions after unicondylar and primary total knee arthroplasty of the German Arthroplasty Registry

被引:2
作者
Straub, Josina [1 ]
Szymski, Dominik [1 ]
Walter, Nike [1 ]
Wu, Yinan [2 ]
Melsheimer, Oliver [2 ]
Grimberg, Alexander [2 ]
Alt, Volker [1 ]
Steinbrueck, Arnd [2 ,3 ]
Rupp, Markus [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Trauma Surg, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Deutsch Endoprothesenregister gGmbH EPRD, Berlin, Germany
[3] Orthopad Chirurg Kompetenzzentrum Augsburg OCKA, Augsburg, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Trauma Surg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
aseptic revision; constrained; knee arthroplasty; register study; unconstrained; unicondylar; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/ksa.12192
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Due to ageing population, the implantation rate of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) is continuously growing. Aseptic revisions in primary knee arthroplasty are a major cause of revision. The aim of the following study was to determinate the incidence and reasons of aseptic revisions in constrained and unconstrained TKA, as well as in unicondylar knee arthroplasties (UKAs). Methods: Data collection was performed using the German Arthroplasty Registry. Reasons for aseptic revisions were calculated. Incidence and comparison of aseptic revisions were analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. A multiple chi(2) test with Holm's method was used to detect group differences in ligament ruptures. Results: Overall, 300,998 cases of knee arthroplasty with 254,144 (84.4%) unconstrained TKA, 9993 (3.3%) constrained TKA and 36,861 (12.3%) UKA were analysed. Aseptic revision rate in UKA was significantly increased compared to unconstrained and constrained TKA (p < 0.0001). In constrained TKA, a 2.0% revision rate for aseptic reasons were reported after 1 year, while in unconstrained TKA 1.1% and in UKA, 2.7% of revisions were identified. After 7 years in constrained TKA 3.3%, in unconstrained TKA 2.8%, and in UKA 7.8% sustained aseptic revision. Ligament instability was the leading cause of aseptic revision accounting for 13.7% in unconstrained TKA. In constrained TKA, 2.8% resulted in a revision due to ligament instability. In the UKA, the most frequent cause of revisions was tibial loosening, accounting for 14.6% of cases, while progression of osteoarthritis accounted for 7.9% of revisions. Ligament instability was observed in 14.1% of males compared to 15.9% of females in unconstrained TKA and in 4.6% in both genders in UKA. Conclusion: In patients with UKA, aseptic revision rates are significantly higher compared to unconstrained and constrained TKA. Ligament instability was the leading cause of aseptic revision in unconstrained TKA. In UKA, the most frequent cause of revisions was tibial loosening, while progression of osteoarthritis was the second most frequent cause of revisions. Comparable levels of ligament instability were observed in both sexes.
引用
收藏
页码:1775 / 1784
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] KNEE INJURY PATTERNS AMONG MEN AND WOMEN IN COLLEGIATE BASKETBALL AND SOCCER - NCAA DATA AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE
    ARENDT, E
    DICK, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (06) : 694 - 701
  • [2] Primary constrained and hinged total knee arthroplasty: 2-and 5-year revision risk compared with unconstrained total knee arthroplasty: a report on 401 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2017
    Badawy, Mona
    Fenstad, Anne Marie
    Furnes, Ove
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2019, 90 (05) : 467 - 472
  • [3] Risk of revision for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty according to fixation and bearing type SHORT- TO MID-TERM RESULTS FROM THE DUTCH ARTHROPLASTY REGISTER
    Burger, J. A.
    Zuiderbaan, H. A.
    Sierevelt, I. N.
    van Steenbergen, L.
    Nolte, P. A.
    Pearle, A. D.
    Kerkhoffs, G. M. M. J.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2021, 103B (07) : 1261 - 1269
  • [4] Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    Mistry, Jaydev B.
    Gwam, Chukwuweike U.
    Mohamed, Nequesha S.
    Choksi, Ujval S.
    Mont, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (09) : 2663 - 2668
  • [5] Effects of menstrual-cycle hormone fluctuations on musculotendinous stiffness and knee joint laxity
    Eiling, E.
    Bryant, A. L.
    Petersen, W.
    Murphy, A.
    Hohmann, E.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [6] Revision TKA due to instability: diagnostics, treatment options and outcomes
    Faschingbauer, Martin
    Reichel, Heiko
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2021, 50 (12): : 979 - 986
  • [7] Grimberg A., 2022, JAHRESBERICHT 2022, P4, DOI [10.36186/reporteprd062022, DOI 10.36186/REPORTEPRD072023]
  • [8] The Effect of Menstrual Cycle and Contraceptives on ACL Injuries and Laxity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Herzberg, Simone D.
    Motu'apuaka, Makalapua L.
    Lambert, William
    Fu, Rongwei
    Brady, Jacqueline
    Guise, Jeanne-Marie
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (07)
  • [9] Hsu H., 2023, KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
  • [10] Orthopaedic registries: the German experience
    Jansson, Volkmar
    Grimberg, Alexander
    Melsheimer, Oliver
    Perka, Carsten
    Steinbrueck, Arnd
    [J]. EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2019, 4 (06): : 401 - 408