An original study assessing biomarker success rate in breast cancer recurrence biomarker research

被引:1
|
作者
Savva, K-V. [1 ]
MacKenzie, A. [2 ]
Coombes, R. C. [1 ]
Zhifang, N. M. [2 ]
Hanna, B. G. [1 ]
Peters, C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, 10th Floor QEQM Wing, London W2 1NY, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, Div Surg, London, England
来源
BMC MEDICINE | 2024年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
Breast cancer; Biomarkers; Translational research; Clinical utility; IMPACT; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12916-024-03460-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundBreast cancer is the second most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Biomarker discovery has led to advances in understanding molecular phenotyping and thus has a great potential for precision management of this diverse disease. Despite increased interest in the biomarker field, only a small number of breast cancer biomarkers are known to be clinically useful. Therefore, it is very important to characterise the success rate of biomarkers in this field and study potential reasons for the deficit. We therefore aim to achieve quantitative characterisation of the biomarker translation gap by tracking the progress of prognostic biomarkers associated with breast cancer recurrence.MethodsAn electronic systematic search was conducted in Medline and Embase databases using keywords and mesh headings associated with breast cancer recurrence biomarkers (1940-2023). Abstracts were screened, and primary clinical studies involving breast cancer recurrence biomarkers were selected. Upon identification of relevant literature, we extracted the biomarker name, date of publication and journal name. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics and GraphPad prism (La Jolla, California, USA).ResultsA total of 19,195 articles were identified, from which 4597 articles reported breast cancer biomarkers associated with recurrence. Upon data extraction, 2437 individual biomarkers were identified. Out of these, 23 are currently recommended for clinical use, which corresponds to only 0.94% of all discovered biomarkers.ConclusionsThis study characterised for the first time the translational gap in the field of recurrence-related breast cancer biomarkers, indicating that only 0.94% of identified biomarkers were recommended for clinical use. This denotes an evident barrier in the biomarker research field and emphasises the need for a clearer route from biomarker discovery through to implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ACLY: A biomarker of recurrence in breast cancer
    Chen, Yue
    Li, Kai
    Gong, Di
    Zhang, Jie
    Li, Qin
    Zhao, Gang
    Lin, Ping
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 216 (09)
  • [2] The Biomarker Toolkit - an evidence-based guideline to predict cancer biomarker success and guide development
    Savva, Katerina-Vanessa
    Kawka, Michal
    Vadhwana, Bhamini
    Penumaka, Rahul
    Patton, Imogen
    Khan, Komal
    Perrott, Claire
    Das, Saranya
    Giot, Maxime
    Mavroveli, Stella
    Hanna, George B.
    Ni, Melody Zhifang
    Peters, Christopher J.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [3] The Biomarker Toolkit — an evidence-based guideline to predict cancer biomarker success and guide development
    Katerina-Vanessa Savva
    Michal Kawka
    Bhamini Vadhwana
    Rahul Penumaka
    Imogen Patton
    Komal Khan
    Claire Perrott
    Saranya Das
    Maxime Giot
    Stella Mavroveli
    George B. Hanna
    Melody Zhifang Ni
    Christopher J. Peters
    BMC Medicine, 21
  • [4] Impact of biospecimens handling on biomarker research in breast cancer
    Loris De Cecco
    Valeria Musella
    Silvia Veneroni
    Vera Cappelletti
    Italia Bongarzone
    Maurizio Callari
    Barbara Valeri
    Marco A Pierotti
    Maria Grazia Daidone
    BMC Cancer, 9
  • [5] Biomarker research with prospective study designs for the early detection of cancer
    Pesch, B.
    Breuning, T.
    Johnen, G.
    Casjens, S.
    Bonberg, N.
    Taeger, D.
    Mueller, A.
    Weber, D. G.
    Behrens, T.
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEINS AND PROTEOMICS, 2014, 1844 (05): : 874 - 883
  • [6] An Overview of a Biomarker in Breast Cancer
    Akhila, Gandraju
    Nagashree, A. G.
    Spandana, K. M. Asha
    Kumar, S. Hemanth
    Harshith, H. S.
    Vardh, R. Vishnu
    Shailesh, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INVESTIGATION, 2023, 13 (04) : 721 - 734
  • [7] MicroRNAs as Biomarker for Breast Cancer
    Aggarwal, Taru
    Wadhwa, Ridhima
    Gupta, Riya
    Paudel, Keshav Raj
    Collet, Trudi
    Chellappan, Dinesh Kumar
    Gupta, Gaurav
    Perumalsamy, Haribalan
    Mehta, Meenu
    Satija, Saurabh
    Hansbro, Philip M.
    Dua, Kamal
    Maurya, Pawan Kumar
    ENDOCRINE METABOLIC & IMMUNE DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2020, 20 (10) : 1597 - 1610
  • [8] Breast cancer and immunology: biomarker and therapeutic developments
    Santa-Maria, Cesar A.
    Park, Sue Jung
    Jain, Sarika
    Gradishar, William J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2015, 15 (10) : 1215 - 1222
  • [9] Metabolomics in Cancer Biomarker Research
    Wang X.
    Chen S.
    Jia W.
    Current Pharmacology Reports, 2016, 2 (6) : 293 - 298
  • [10] Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile
    Rey-Vargas, Laura
    Carlos Mejia-Henao, Juan
    Carolina Sanabria-Salas, Maria
    Serrano-Gomez, Silvia J.
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)