Protecting gains: Extractivism, social movements, and the politics of policy implementation

被引:0
作者
Silva, Eduardo [1 ]
Orozco, Zarai Toledo [2 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Polit Sci, New Orleans, LA USA
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Peru, Dept Social Sci, Lima, Peru
关键词
Extractivism; Social movements; Policy implementation; Political economy; Latin America; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.exis.2024.101447
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scholarship on social movements around conflicts over extractive development has advanced in identifying when movements are likely to impact policy adoption. Yet, in Latin America policies are rarely implemented - a reality that commonly leads conflicts to reignite. This introduction sheds light over this often overlooked issue. We focus on the politics of policy implementation - when and how social movements around extractive development have higher chances to favorably impact policy enforcement. To this end, we switch the attention from the strategies of social movements and their outcomes over policy implementation at the local level, to their cumulative impact on national -level policy. We argue for a comparative political economy approach that enables us to identify the systemic, intermediate, and short-term factors that impact the effect of movements on conflicts over policy implementation. Building on this approach, we propose three potential implementation outcomes - positive, status quo and rollback - depending on the degree to which they align with a movement's position. We conclude highlighting the contributions of the articles in this issue to the politics of policy implementation and providing some insights for social movements' course of action to protect their gains.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Amengual M, 2020, POLITICS OF INSTITUTIONAL WEAKNESS IN LATIN AMERICA, P161
[2]   Age for leisure? Political mediation and the impact of the pension movement on US old-age policy [J].
Amenta, E ;
Caren, N ;
Olasky, SJ .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 70 (03) :516-538
[3]  
Andrade P., 2015, Gobernanza Ambiental en America Latina, P135
[4]   Social movements and policy implementation: The Mississippi civil rights movement and the War on Poverty, 1965 to 1971 [J].
Andrews, KT .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 66 (01) :71-95
[5]  
Arce Moises., 2014, Resource extraction and protest in Peru, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT9QH8Z9
[6]   Aggravating the Resource Curse: Decentralisation, Mining and Conflict in Peru [J].
Arellano-Yanguas, Javier .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2011, 47 (04) :617-638
[7]   The extractive imperative in Latin America [J].
Arsel, Murat ;
Hogenboom, Barbara ;
Pellegrini, Lorenzo .
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2016, 3 (04) :880-887
[8]   Advocating for Change? How a Civil Society-led Coalition Influences the Implementation of the Forest Rights Act in India [J].
Barnes, Clare ;
Van Laerhoven, Frank ;
Driessen, Peter P. J. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 84 :162-175
[9]   Contention and Ambiguity: Mining and the Possibilities of Development [J].
Bebbington, Anthony ;
Hinojosa, Leonith ;
Bebbington, Denise Humphreys ;
Burneo, Maria Luisa ;
Warnaars, Ximena .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2008, 39 (06) :887-914
[10]  
Bebbington Anthony., 2012, Social Conflict, Economic Development, and Extractive Industry: Evidence from South America