Adaptive mesh methods on compact manifolds via Optimal Transport and Optimal Information Transport

被引:0
作者
Turnquist A.G.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, 78712, TX
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Compact manifolds; Convergent numerical methods; Diffeomorphic density matching; Moving mesh methods; Optimal information transport; Optimal transport;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112726
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Moving mesh methods were devised to redistribute a mesh in a smooth way, while keeping the number of vertices of the mesh and their connectivity unchanged. A fruitful theoretical point-of-view is to take such moving mesh methods and think of them as an application of the diffeomorphic density matching problem. Given two probability measures μ0 and μ1, the diffeomorphic density matching problem consists of finding a diffeomorphic pushforward map T such that T#μ0=μ1. Moving mesh methods are seen to be an instance of the diffeomorphic density matching problem by treating the probability density as the local density of nodes in the mesh. It is preferable that the restructuring of the mesh be done in a smooth way that avoids tangling the connections between nodes, which would lead to numerical instability when the mesh is used in computational applications. This then suggests that a diffeomorphic map T is desirable to avoid tangling. The first tool employed to solve the moving mesh problem between source and target probability densities on the sphere was Optimal Transport (OT). Recently Optimal Information Transport (OIT) was rigorously derived and developed allowing for the computation of a diffeomorphic mapping by simply solving a Poisson equation. Not only is the equation simpler to solve numerically in OIT, but with Optimal Transport there is no guarantee that the mapping between probability density functions defines a diffeomorphism for general 2D compact manifolds. In this manuscript, we perform a side-by-side comparison of using Optimal Transport and Optimal Information Transport on the sphere for adaptive mesh problems. We choose to perform this comparison with recently developed provably convergent solvers, but these are, of course, not the only numerical methods that may be used. We believe that Optimal Information Transport is preferable in computations due to the fact that the partial differential equation (PDE) solve step is simply a Poisson equation. For more general surfaces M, we show how the Optimal Transport and Optimal Information Transport problems can be reduced to solving on the sphere, provided that there exists a diffeomorphic mapping Φ:M→S2. This implies that the Optimal Transport problem on M with a special cost function can be solved with regularity guarantees, while computations for the problem are performed on the unit sphere. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal Transport Based Tracking of Space Objects in Cylindrical Manifolds
    Das, Niladri
    Ghosh, Riddhi Pratim
    Guha, Nilabja
    Bhattacharya, Raktim
    Mallick, Bani
    JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 66 (04) : 582 - 606
  • [22] Coupling matrix manifolds assisted optimization for optimal transport problems
    Dai Shi
    Junbin Gao
    Xia Hong
    S. T. Boris Choy
    Zhiyong Wang
    Machine Learning, 2021, 110 : 533 - 558
  • [23] Improved Optimization Methods for Regularized Optimal Transport
    Cui, Shaobo
    Song, Chaobing
    Jiang, Yong
    2017 IEEE 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI 2017), 2017, : 695 - 700
  • [24] EFFICIENT PRECONDITIONERS FOR SOLVING DYNAMICAL OPTIMAL TRANSPORT VIA INTERIOR POINT METHODS
    Facca, Enrico
    Todeschi, Gabriele
    Natale, Andrea
    Benzi, Michele
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2024, 46 (03) : A1397 - A1422
  • [25] Learning to Match via Inverse Optimal Transport
    Li, Ruilin
    Ye, Xiaojing
    Zhou, Haomin
    Zha, Hongyuan
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2019, 20
  • [26] Visual Prompting via Partial Optimal Transport
    Zheng, Mengyu
    Hao, Zhiwei
    Tang, Yehui
    Xu, Chang
    COMPUTER VISION-ECCV 2024, PT XXXV, 2025, 15093 : 1 - 18
  • [27] From Bachelier to Dupire via optimal transport
    Mathias Beiglböck
    Gudmund Pammer
    Walter Schachermayer
    Finance and Stochastics, 2022, 26 : 59 - 84
  • [28] FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transport
    Black, Emily
    Yeom, Samuel
    Fredrikson, Matt
    FAT* '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, 2020, : 111 - 121
  • [29] From Bachelier to Dupire via optimal transport
    Beiglboeck, Mathias
    Pammer, Gudmund
    Schachermayer, Walter
    FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS, 2022, 26 (01) : 59 - 84
  • [30] GEOMETRY OF GRAPH PARTITIONS VIA OPTIMAL TRANSPORT
    Abrishami, Tara
    Guillen, Nestor
    Rule, Parker
    Schutzman, Zachary
    Solomon, Justin
    Weighill, Thomas
    Wu, Si
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2020, 42 (05) : A3340 - A3366