Mapping and assessment of karst landscape aesthetic value from a world heritage perspective: a case study of the Huangguoshu Scenic area

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Kangning [1 ]
Zhao, Xi [1 ]
Lyu, Xiaoxi [1 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Normal Univ, State Engn Technol Inst Karst Desertificat Control, Sch Karst Sci, Guiyang 550001, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, Peoples R China
来源
HERITAGE SCIENCE | 2024年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
World heritage site; Aesthetic value; Mapping and assessment; GIS-based spatial overlay analysis; Karst landscape; CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NATIONAL NATURE-RESERVE; QUALITY OBJECTIVES; INDICATORS; PREFERENCES; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s40494-024-01312-3
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Aesthetic value is an essential component of outstanding universal value (OUV) for natural world heritage (NWH) site. However, comparisons of aesthetic value lack a set of effective evaluation systems. In the identification of aesthetic value, there is subjectivity and difficulty in quantifying the methodology suggested by the IUCN in the operation manual, and it is difficult to compare in different NWH sites. This study focused on establishing a universal system to map and assess the aesthetic value of karst NWH sites. The research focused on three dimensions: naturalness, diversity, and uniqueness. The final combination of the three is achieved by geographic information system (GIS)-based spatial map overlay analysis with multisource data. To verify the rationality of the model, the aesthetic value of a case study in the Huangguoshu Scenic Area in China at the WH nominated site was evaluated. The results revealed that the areas with low, relatively low, medium, relatively high, and high values accounted for 12.2%, 20.2%, 32.4%, 21.4% and 13.8%, respectively. The distribution of aesthetic value is basically consistent with the boundary division of the NWH site, and high scores are mostly distributed in areas with high protection levels. Moreover, the impacts of naturalness, uniqueness and diversity on aesthetic value in the research area are in decreasing order. Furthermore, the research analyses the aesthetic characteristics and causes at different levels. The research area combines the quintessential nature of karst, hills and water, caves, fenglin and historic villages; it unifies sturdiness, peculiarity, precipitousness, and peace. Among the 7 nominated NWH sites, the Huangguoshu Waterfall has the highest aesthetic value, while those of Tiantaishan Ancient Temple and Getuhe are relatively low. The rationality of the evaluation system for extracting areas with high aesthetic value was demonstrated. This study compensates for the limitation of the inability of existing studies to quantify the aesthetic value. This approach fills a previous gap in the research on the aesthetic value of WH and can provide a useful reference for better protection and management decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [31] Mitchell N., 2013, Study on the application of criterion (vii): considering superlative natural phenomena and exceptional natural beauty within the World Heritage Convention
  • [32] Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference
    Ode, Asa
    Fry, Gary
    Tveit, Mari S.
    Messager, Pernette
    Miller, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (01) : 375 - 383
  • [33] Oladeji SO., 2012, Am J Tour Manag, V1, P9, DOI [10.5923/j.tourism.20120103.02, DOI 10.5923/J.TOURISM.20120103.02]
  • [34] Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU
    Paracchini, Maria Luisa
    Zulian, Grazia
    Kopperoinen, Leena
    Maes, Joachim
    Schaegner, Jan Philipp
    Termansen, Mette
    Zandersen, Marianne
    Perez-Soba, Marta
    Scholefield, Paul A.
    Bidoglio, Giovanni
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 45 : 371 - 385
  • [35] Eco-efficiency and its determinants at a tourism destination: A case study of Huangshan National Park, China
    Peng, Hongsong
    Zhang, Jinhe
    Lu, Lin
    Tang, Guorong
    Yan, Bingjin
    Xiao, Xiao
    Han, Ya
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 : 201 - 211
  • [36] The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology
    Pike, Kate
    Wright, Paul
    Wink, Brian
    Fletcher, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 19 (05) : 667 - 675
  • [37] Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Dijks, Sebastian
    Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
    Bieling, Claudia
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 33 : 118 - 129
  • [38] Can visitors visually distinguish successive coastal landscapes? A case study from the Curonian Spit (Lithuania)
    Povilanskas, Ramunas
    Baziuke, Dalia
    Ducinskas, Kestutis
    Urbis, Arvydas
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 119 : 109 - 118
  • [39] [齐童 Qi Tong], 2013, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V32, P975
  • [40] The effectiveness of protection policies and legislative framework with special regard to karst landscapes: Insights from Slovenia
    Ravbar, Natasa
    Sebela, Stanka
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 51 : 106 - 116