Olympic Weightlifting Training for Sprint Performance in Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Crenshaw, Kristen [1 ]
Zeppieri, Giorgio [2 ]
Hung, Cheng-Ju [3 ]
Schmitfranz, Tania [4 ]
McCall, Patti [5 ]
Castellini, Greta [6 ]
Gianola, Silvia [6 ]
Pozzi, Federico [4 ]
机构
[1] Sports Phys Therapy Residency program, Sports Phys Therapy Residency Program, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] UF Hlth, Rehabili, 3450 Hull Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Dept Phys Therapy, UF Hlth, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Phys Therapy, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Univ Florida, George A Smathers Lib, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Galeazzi, Orthoped, Milan, Italy
关键词
olympic weightlifting; sprint; athletes; training; POWER; PROGRAMS; RELIABILITY; PARAMETERS; QUALITIES; EXERCISES; STRENGTH; ABILITY; TESTS; HAND;
D O I
10.1055/a-2161-4867
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether Olympic weightlifting (OW) exercises would improve sprint performance when compared to a control intervention, (no training, standard sport-specific training, traditional resistance training, or plyometric training). Medline, Web of Science, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and Biological Science from inception to September 2022 was searched. Two authors independently selected the included studies, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The primary meta-analysis combined the results of the sprint performance over the full length of each sprint test. The secondary meta-analyses combined the results of the sprint performance at 5, 10, and 20 m distance to capture information about the acceleration phase of the sprint tests. Eight studies with 206 athletes (female n=10, age range: 18.9-24.2 years) were identified. Sprint performance did not differ significantly comparing OW to the control intervention, nor at the full length (standardized mean difference=-0.07, 95% CI=-0.47 to 0.34, p =0.75, I 2 =46%) or during the acceleration phase ( p >= 0.26) of the sprint test. OW training does not improve sprint performance to a greater extent than comparator interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 421
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] PLYOMETRIC TRAINING EFFECTS ON ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE IN YOUTH SOCCER ATHLETES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Bedoya, Abigail A.
    Miltenberger, Matthew R.
    Lopez, Rebecca M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (08) : 2351 - 2360
  • [2] Brown TD, 2004, J SPORT SCI MED, V3, P203
  • [3] Effect of weightlifting training on jumping ability, sprinting performance and squat strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Garcia-Valverde, Adrian
    Manresa-Rocamora, Agustin
    Hernandez-Davo, Jose L.
    Sabido, Rafael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE & COACHING, 2022, 17 (04) : 917 - 939
  • [4] GreenS, 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 Updated March 2011
  • [5] Olympic weightlifting training improves vertical jump height in sportspeople: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Hackett, Daniel
    Davies, Tim
    Soomro, Najeebullah
    Halaki, Mark
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 50 (14) : 865 - U103
  • [6] Haff GG, 2001, STRENGTH COND J, V23, P13, DOI 10.1519/1533-4295(2001)023<0013:ABREEA>2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Profile of a Strength and Conditioning Coach: Backgrounds, Duties, and Perceptions
    Hartshorn, Mark D.
    Read, Paul J.
    Bishop, Chris
    Turner, Anthony N.
    [J]. STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2016, 38 (06) : 89 - 94
  • [9] The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance: an Integration of Scientific and Best Practice Literature
    Haugen, Thomas
    Seiler, Stephen
    Sandbakk, Oyvind
    Tonnessen, Espen
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [10] Sprint Running Performance Monitoring: Methodological and Practical Considerationsty
    Haugen, Thomas
    Buchheit, Martin
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 46 (05) : 641 - 656