Palliative Care in the Community: The Greek Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™)

被引:0
作者
Bouri, Maria [1 ,3 ]
Sakellari, Evanthia [1 ]
Krentiris, Dimitrios [2 ]
Lagiou, Areti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Attica, Athens, Greece
[2] 2nd Reg Hlth Author Piraeus & Aegean, Hlth Ctr Salamina, Agios Ioannis Rentis, Greece
[3] Univ West Attica, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Publ & Community Hlth, Lab Hyg & Epidemiol, Athens Campus,196 Alexandras Ave, Athens 11521, Greece
关键词
supportive and palliative care indicators tool; SPICT; primary care; palliative and supportive care; cross-cultural adaptation; Greece; focus groups; NEEDS; VALIDATION; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1177/21501319241245842
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction/Objectives: Systematic identification of persons with palliative care needs constitutes a major challenge for promoting palliative care in all levels of the health system, including primary care. The aim of this study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and content validate Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) for use in the Greek primary care context. Secondary objectives were to probe the use of SPICT-GR in exemplary case vignettes, to discuss the clarity and comprehensibility of its content as well as the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the tool within the Greek primary care.Methods: The Greek translation and cross-cultural adaptation of SPICT (TM) followed World Health Organization recommendations for translation and adaptation of instruments. For this purpose a working group was set up consisting of 2 senior researchers, a primary care professional with postgraduate training in Palliative Medicine and a general practitioner (GP) with special interest in primary palliative care. Three focus groups comprised of health professionals (n = 23) working in primary care settings participated in the pilot testing phase. Participants also completed a questionnaire including rating their perceptions on tool's utility and feasibility as well as on the clarity and relevance of its items. Thematic analysis was used for focus groups discussions on how the tool was perceived and interpreted by health professionals in a Greek healthcare context and descriptive statistics for the quantitative analysis of the questionnaire data.Results: The majority assessed the tool as useful (65%), considered its implementation in primary care as feasible (91%) and rated its items as "relevant" or "very relevant" and "clear" or "very clear." Three themes emerged from focus groups discussions: Guiding clinical practice and facilitating collaboration; promoting comprehensive care and awareness for palliative care; applicability in and suitability for primary care.Conclusions: SPICT-GR (TM) was identified as a practical and applicable tool for primary care, a source of guidance for the comprehensive identification of patients' palliative care needs, promoting awareness on palliative care and facilitating a shared language among health care professionals.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Structured implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in general practice - A prospective interventional study with follow-up
    Afshar, Kambiz
    van Baal, Katharina
    Wiese, Birgitt
    Schleef, Tanja
    Stiel, Stephanie
    Mueller-Mundt, Gabriele
    Schneider, Nils
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [2] Afshar Kambiz, 2020, Ger Med Sci, V18, pDoc02, DOI 10.3205/000278
  • [3] Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
    Afshar, Kambiz
    Feichtner, Angelika
    Boyd, Kirsty
    Murray, Scott
    Juenger, Saskia
    Wiese, Birgitt
    Schneider, Nils
    Mueller-Mundt, Gabriele
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 17
  • [4] Fachado AA, 2018, REV SAUDE PUBL, V52, DOI [10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000398, 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000398]
  • [5] Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™) in a Danish healthcare context: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and content validation
    Bergenholtz, Heidi
    Weibull, Anna
    Raunkiaer, Mette
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [6] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
  • [7] Supportive and palliative care indicators tool (SPICT™): content validity, feasibility and pre-test of the Italian version
    Casale, Giuseppe
    Magnani, Caterina
    Fanelli, Renato
    Surdo, Laura
    Goletti, Mauro
    Boyd, Kirsty
    D'Angelo, Daniela
    Mastroianni, Chiara
    Cancian, Maurizio
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [8] Palliative Referrals in Advanced Cancer Patients: Utilizing the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool and Rothman Index
    Chan, Abigail Sy
    Rout, Amit
    D'Adamo, Christopher R.
    Lev, Irina
    Yu, Amy
    Miller, Kenneth
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (02) : 164 - 168
  • [9] Validation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in a Geriatric Population
    De Bock, Reine
    Van den Noortgate, Nele
    Piers, Ruth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 21 (02) : 220 - 224
  • [10] Early Identification of People Who Would Benefit From a Palliative Approach-Moving From Surprise to Routine
    Downar, James
    Wegier, Pete
    Tanuseputro, Peter
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (09)