Research progress of deactivation mechanism and regeneration of Co-based catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

被引:0
作者
He R. [1 ]
Qin S. [1 ]
Li J. [1 ]
Yan B. [1 ]
Duan X. [1 ]
机构
[1] National Institute of Clear-Low-Carbon Energy, Beijing
来源
Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress | 2021年 / 40卷 / S1期
关键词
catalyst; life time; mechanism; regeneration; syngas;
D O I
10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2020-2330
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, the recent advances on the study of the Co-based catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, i. e., the deactivation mechanism, regeneration method of catalyst and how to prolong the catalyst life, are reviewed. The main causes of catalyst deactivation in Co-based FTS are poisoning, sintering of Co, carbon deposition, re-oxidation, metal-support solid state reactions, surface reconstruction, surface blockage and attrition. Carbon deposition and sintering of Co are the main reasons of Co-based catalyst deactivation, the key to prolong the life of Co-based catalysts for FT synthesis is to improve the resistance to the sintering of Co and coke deposition. The resistance to the sintering of Co could be improved by enhancing the interaction between the active metal Co and the support, controlling the Co metal particle size distribution and adopting coated or confined method. The carbon deposition can be inhibited by adding promoters, adjusting the experimental conditions (e.g. H2 /CO, GHSV). The catalyst could be regenerated by hydrogen treatment, de-wax, oxidation and reduction, de-wax, oxidation, solution treatment and reduction, in order to reactivate catalyst efficiently, the selection of optimal regeneration method should be combined with the main reason of catalyst deactivation. In the future, it is the key to improve the stability of catalyst and solve the industrial scale-up research of catalyst regeneration technology. © 2021, Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 190
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
SUN Qiwen, WU Jianming, ZHANG Zongsen, Et al., Indirect coal liquefaction technology and its reaearch progress, Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 32, 1, pp. 1-12, (2013)
[2]  
HOU Chaopeng, XIA Guofu, LI Mingfeng, Et al., Thermodynamics of carbonyl sulfide poisoning on F-T synthesis catalyst, Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 40, 1, pp. 68-74, (2012)
[3]  
DRY M E., The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950—2000[J], Catalysis Today, 71, 3, pp. 227-241, (2002)
[4]  
BARTHOLOMEW C H, BOWMAN R M., Sulfur poisoning of cobalt and iron Fisher-Tropsch catalysts, Applied Catalysis, 15, 1, pp. 59-67, (1985)
[5]  
VISCONTI C G, LIETTI L, FORZATTI P, Et al., Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on sulphur poisoned Co/Al2 O3, catalyst, Applied Catalysis A: General, 330, 1, pp. 49-56, (2007)
[6]  
SAIB A M, MOODLEY D J, CIOBC I M, Et al., Fundamental understanding of deactivation and regeneration of cobalt Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts, Catalysis Today, 154, 3, pp. 271-282, (2010)
[7]  
CLARKSON J, ELLIS P R, HUMBLE R, Et al., Deactivation of alumina supported cobalt F-T catalysts during testing in a continuous-stirred tank reactor (CSTR), Applied Catalysis A: General, 550, pp. 28-37, (2018)
[8]  
SOLED S L, KISS G, KLIEWER C, Et al., Learnings from Co Fischer-Tropsch catalyst studies, American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints, 58, 1, pp. 1286-1286, (2013)
[9]  
SHI Lihong, LI Xiaofeng, LI Debao, Et al., Deactivation of cobalt-based catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 31, 12, pp. 1483-1488, (2010)
[10]  
KLIEWER C E, SOLED S L, KISS G., Morphological transformations during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on a titania-supported cobalt catalyst, Catalysis Today, 323, pp. 233-256, (2019)