Fatigue Crack Growth Rates and Crack Tip Opening Loads in CT Specimens Made of SDSS and Manufactured Using WAAM

被引:0
作者
Sales, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Khanna, Aditya [3 ]
Hughes, James [1 ]
Yin, Ling [1 ]
Kotousov, Andrei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Elect & Mech Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] AML3D Ltd, 35 Woomera Ave, Edinburgh, SA 5111, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Mech & Min Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
fatigue; crack tip opening load; compact tension (CT) specimen; WAAM; super duplex stainless steel; compliance-based method; DUPLEX STAINLESS-STEELS; WIRE;
D O I
10.3390/ma17081842
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing offers greater flexibility in the design and fabrication of structural components with complex shapes. However, the use of additively manufactured parts for load-bearing structural applications, specifically involving cyclic loading, requires a thorough investigation of material fatigue properties. These properties can be affected by many factors, including residual stresses and crack tip shielding mechanisms, which can be very different from those of conventionally manufactured materials. This research focuses on super duplex stainless steels (SDSSs) fabricated with wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and investigates their fatigue crack growth rates and the net effect of crack tip shielding mechanisms. Using the compliance-based method, we measured crack tip opening loads in compact tension (CT) specimens with cracks propagating longitudinally and transversely to the WAAM deposition direction. It was found that fatigue crack growth rates were very similar in both directions when correlated by the effective stress intensity factor range. However, the differences in crack tip opening loads explain a quite significant influence of the deposition direction on the fatigue life.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Afzali N., 2023, Ce/Papers, V6, P607, DOI [10.1002/cepa.2597, DOI 10.1002/CEPA.2597]
  • [2] Alvarez-Armas I., 2008, RECENT PATENTS MECH, V1, P51, DOI DOI 10.2174/2212797610801010051
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, ASTM E1245-2003
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, E647-23 A
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, STANDARD TEST METHOD
  • [6] Berglund G., 1989, Materials & Design, V10, P23, DOI 10.1016/0261-3069(89)90031-9
  • [7] Criticality of porosity defects on the fatigue performance of wire plus arc additive manufactured titanium alloy
    Biswal, Romali
    Zhang, Xiang
    Syed, Abdul Khadar
    Awd, Mustafa
    Ding, Jialuo
    Walther, Frank
    Williams, Stewart
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2019, 122 : 208 - 217
  • [8] Fatigue strength assessment of duplex and super-duplex stainless steels by 4R method
    Bjork, Timo
    Mettanen, Heli
    Ahola, Antti
    Lindgren, Mari
    Terva, Juuso
    [J]. WELDING IN THE WORLD, 2018, 62 (06) : 1285 - 1300
  • [9] Fatigue crack propagation in cast duplex stainless steels: thermal ageing and microstructural effects
    Calonne, V
    Gourgues, AF
    Pineau, A
    [J]. FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2004, 27 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [10] Improvement of ASTM compliance offset method for precise determination of crack opening load
    Chung, Youn-Il
    Song, Ji-Ho
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2009, 31 (05) : 809 - 819