Impact of thermal pre-treatment on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and landfill leachate

被引:11
作者
Bonu R. [1 ]
Anand N. [1 ]
Palani S.G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Jawahar Nagar, Kapra Mandal, Medchal District, Hyderabad, 500078, Telangana
来源
Materials Today: Proceedings | 2023年 / 72卷
关键词
Anaerobic co-digestion; Biogas; Landfill leachate; Sewage sludge; Thermal pre-treatment;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.130
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The complex microbial flocs with rigid cell walls and undigested organic matter in the domestic sewage sludge defy anaerobic digestion, especially hydrolysis, the rate-limiting step of anaerobic digestion. The anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste landfill leachate is challenging because of its high refractory organics and ammoniacal nitrogen. However, if sewage sludge and landfill leachate are mixed in an optimal ratio and pre-treated, they can be anaerobically co-digested and clean bioenergy can be harnessed. Among the pre-treatment methods, thermal pre-treatment is preferred because it is simple and economical yet effective. In this investigation, sewage sludge from a domestic sewage treatment plant and landfill leachate from an active municipal solid waste landfill were mixed in the ratio of 75:25 and thermally pre-treated at 70 °C for 60 min. The pre-treated substrates were anaerobically digested at 37 ± 1 °C using fresh cow dung slurry as the inocula. The results of this experiment were compared with the control experiment in which substrates without pre-treatment were used. Though biogas production from the fresh substrates was higher during the initial days, it decreased after the seventh day. For the thermal pre-treated substrates, the biogas production was low during the first week, which started to increase from the tenth day until the end of the experiment. The cumulative biogas yields from untreated and thermal pre-treated reactors were 723.5 and 418 mL, respectively. © 2022
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 103
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
(2021)
[2]  
Crini G., Lichtfouse E., Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment, Environ. Chem. Lett., 17, 1, pp. 145-155, (2019)
[3]  
Dai J.-Y., Chen L., Zhao J.-F., Ma N., Characteristics of sewage sludge and distribution of heavy metal in plants with amendment of sewage sludge, J. Environ. Sci. (China), 18, 6, pp. 1094-1100, (2006)
[4]  
Kelessidis A., Stasinakis A.S., Comparative study of the methods used for treatment and final disposal of sewage sludge in European countries, Waste Manag., 32, 6, pp. 1186-1195, (2012)
[5]  
Khanh Nguyen V., Kumar Chaudhary D., Hari Dahal R., Hoang Trinh N., Kim J., Chang S.W., Hong Y., Duc La D., Nguyen X.C., Hao Ngo H., Chung W.J., Nguyen D.D., Review on pretreatment techniques to improve anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge, Fuel, 285, (2021)
[6]  
Zheng X., Jiang Z., Ying Z., Song J., Chen W., Wang B.O., Role of feedstock properties and hydrothermal carbonization conditions on fuel properties of sewage sludge-derived hydrochar using multiple linear regression technique, Fuel, 271, (2020)
[7]  
Lytras G., Lytras C., Mathioudakis D., Papadopoulou K., Lyberatos G., Food waste valorization based on anaerobic digestion, Waste Biomass Valorization, 12, 4, pp. 1677-1697, (2021)
[8]  
Shi L., Simplicio W.S., Wu G., Hu Z., Hu H., Zhan X., Nutrient recovery from digestate of anaerobic digestion of livestock manure: a review, Curr. Pollut. Reports, 4, 2, pp. 74-83, (2018)
[9]  
Karak T., Bhagat R.M., Bhattacharyya P., Municipal solid waste generation, composition, and management: the world scenario, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 15, pp. 1509-1630, (2012)
[10]  
Wiszniowski J., Robert D., Surmacz-Gorska J., Miksch K., Weber J.V., Landfill leachate treatment methods: a review, Environ. Chem. Lett., 4, 1, pp. 51-61, (2006)