Intercomparison of deep learning models in predicting streamflow patterns: insight from CMIP6

被引:2
|
作者
Anwar, Hamid [1 ]
Khan, Afed Ullah [1 ]
Ullah, Basir [1 ]
Taha, Abubakr Taha Bakheit [2 ,3 ]
Najeh, Taoufik [4 ]
Badshah, Muhammad Usman [5 ]
Ghanim, Abdulnoor A. J. [6 ]
Irfan, Muhammad [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
[2] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
[3] Red Sea Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Port 36481, Sudan
[4] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, Operat & Maintenance, Operat Maintenance & Acoust, Lulea, Sweden
[5] Water & Power Div, Peshawar, Pakistan
[6] Najran Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
[7] Najran Univ Saudi Arabia, Coll Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Streamflow; Prediction; Deep learning; GCM; CMIP6;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-63989-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This research was carried out to predict daily streamflow for the Swat River Basin, Pakistan through four deep learning (DL) models: Feed Forward Artificial Neural Networks (FFANN), Seasonal Artificial Neural Networks (SANN), Time Lag Artificial Neural Networks (TLANN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) under two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) 585 and 245. Taylor Diagram, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting techniques were used to select the best combination of General Circulation Models (GCMs) for Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) computation. MME was computed via the Random Forest technique for Maximum Temperature (Tmax), Minimum Temperature (Tmin), and precipitation for the aforementioned three techniques. The best MME for Tmax, Tmin, and precipitation was rendered by Compromise Programming. The DL models were trained and tested using observed precipitation and temperature as independent variables and discharge as dependent variables. The results of deep learning models were evaluated using statistical performance indicators such as root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The TLANN demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models based on RMSE, MSE, MAE, and R2 during training (65.25 m3/s, 4256.97 m3/s, 46.793 m3/s and 0.7978) and testing (72.06 m3/s, 5192.95 m3/s, 51.363 m3/s and 0.7443) respectively. Subsequently, TLANN was utilized to make predictions based on MME of SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios for future streamflow until the year 2100. These results can be used for planning, management, and policy-making regarding water resources projects in the study area.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Future projections of precipitation extremes over East Asia based on a deep learning downscaled CMIP6 high-resolution (0.1°) dataset
    Yang, Yi
    Lin, Hai
    Xu, Yi
    Pan, Hang
    Dong, Guangtao
    Tang, Jianping
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2025, 178 (01)
  • [42] Future projections of temperature extremes over East Asia based on a deep learning downscaled CMIP6 high-resolution (0.1°) dataset
    Pan, Hang
    Lin, Hai
    Xu, Yi
    Yang, Yi
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2024, 305
  • [43] Predicting the invasion risk of rugose spiraling whitefly, Aleurodicus rugioperculatus, in India based on CMIP6 projections by MaxEnt
    Maruthadurai, Ramasamy
    Das, Bappa
    Ramesh, Raman
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 79 (01) : 295 - 305
  • [44] Flood inundation mapping under climate change scenarios: insights from CMIP6
    Sadiqzai, Hazrat Younus
    Khan, Afed Ullah
    Khan, Fayaz Ahmad
    Ullah, Basir
    Khan, Jehanzeb
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (06) : 2419 - 2441
  • [45] An evaluation of statistical and deep learning-based correction of monthly precipitation over the Yangtze River basin in China based on CMIP6 GCMs
    He, An
    Wang, Chao
    Xu, Lei
    Wang, Peng
    Wang, Wei
    Chen, Nengcheng
    Chen, Zeqiang
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [46] Predicting the Computational Cost of Deep Learning Models
    Justus, Daniel
    Brennan, John
    Bonner, Stephen
    McGough, Andrew Stephen
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2018, : 3873 - 3882
  • [47] Enhancing streamflow simulations with gated recurrent units deep learning models in the flood prone region with low-convergence streamflow data
    Karamvand, Aliakbar
    Hosseini, Seyed Abbas
    Azizi, Seyed Ali
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2024, 136
  • [48] A Comparative Assessment of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for the Daily River Streamflow Forecasting
    Danesh, Malihe
    Gharehbaghi, Amin
    Mehdizadeh, Saeid
    Danesh, Amirhossein
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, : 1911 - 1930
  • [49] Streamflow projection under CMIP6 climate scenarios using a support vector regression: a case study of the Kurau River Basin of Northern Malaysia
    Nasir, Muhammad Adib Mohd
    Zainuddin, Zaitul Marlizawati
    Harun, Sobri
    Kamal, Md Rowshon
    Ismail, Habibu
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 83 (04)
  • [50] Streamflow projection under CMIP6 climate scenarios using a support vector regression: a case study of the Kurau River Basin of Northern Malaysia
    Muhammad Adib Mohd Nasir
    Zaitul Marlizawati Zainuddin
    Sobri Harun
    Md Rowshon Kamal
    Habibu Ismail
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2024, 83