Intercomparison of deep learning models in predicting streamflow patterns: insight from CMIP6

被引:2
|
作者
Anwar, Hamid [1 ]
Khan, Afed Ullah [1 ]
Ullah, Basir [1 ]
Taha, Abubakr Taha Bakheit [2 ,3 ]
Najeh, Taoufik [4 ]
Badshah, Muhammad Usman [5 ]
Ghanim, Abdulnoor A. J. [6 ]
Irfan, Muhammad [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
[2] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
[3] Red Sea Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Port 36481, Sudan
[4] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, Operat & Maintenance, Operat Maintenance & Acoust, Lulea, Sweden
[5] Water & Power Div, Peshawar, Pakistan
[6] Najran Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
[7] Najran Univ Saudi Arabia, Coll Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Streamflow; Prediction; Deep learning; GCM; CMIP6;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-63989-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This research was carried out to predict daily streamflow for the Swat River Basin, Pakistan through four deep learning (DL) models: Feed Forward Artificial Neural Networks (FFANN), Seasonal Artificial Neural Networks (SANN), Time Lag Artificial Neural Networks (TLANN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) under two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) 585 and 245. Taylor Diagram, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting techniques were used to select the best combination of General Circulation Models (GCMs) for Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) computation. MME was computed via the Random Forest technique for Maximum Temperature (Tmax), Minimum Temperature (Tmin), and precipitation for the aforementioned three techniques. The best MME for Tmax, Tmin, and precipitation was rendered by Compromise Programming. The DL models were trained and tested using observed precipitation and temperature as independent variables and discharge as dependent variables. The results of deep learning models were evaluated using statistical performance indicators such as root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The TLANN demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models based on RMSE, MSE, MAE, and R2 during training (65.25 m3/s, 4256.97 m3/s, 46.793 m3/s and 0.7978) and testing (72.06 m3/s, 5192.95 m3/s, 51.363 m3/s and 0.7443) respectively. Subsequently, TLANN was utilized to make predictions based on MME of SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios for future streamflow until the year 2100. These results can be used for planning, management, and policy-making regarding water resources projects in the study area.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A deep learning based classification of atmospheric circulation types over Europe: projection of future changes in a CMIP6 large ensemble
    Mittermeier, M.
    Weigert, M.
    Ruegamer, D.
    Kuechenhoff, H.
    Ludwig, R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (08)
  • [32] Projecting and Downscaling Future Temperature and Precipitation Based on CMIP6 Models Using Machine Learning in Hatay Province, Türkiye
    Ozbuldu, Mustafa
    Irvem, Ahmet
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2025, : 1825 - 1842
  • [33] Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method
    Zhang, Shuangyi
    Li, Xichen
    ENERGY, 2021, 217
  • [34] Unraveling the global teleconnections of Indian summer monsoon clouds: expedition from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Dutta, Ushnanshu
    Hazra, Anupam
    Chaudhari, Hemantkumar S.
    Saha, Subodh Kumar
    Pokhrel, Samir
    Verma, Utkarsh
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2022, 215
  • [35] Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models over MENA Region Using Historical Simulations and Future Projections
    Hamed, Mohammed Magdy
    Nashwan, Mohamed Salem
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [36] On the Pacific Decadal Oscillation Simulations in CMIP6 Models: A New Test-Bed from Climate Network Analysis
    Ma, Yiling
    Yuan, Naiming
    Dong, Tianyun
    Dong, Wenjie
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2023, 59 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [37] Can CMIP6 models reproduce the influence of ENSO on the variability of boreal winter Hadley Circulation?
    Wang, Shuang
    Xu, Falei
    Feng, Juan
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2024, 309
  • [38] Statistical downscaling of maximum temperature under CMIP6 global climate models and evaluation of heat wave events using deep learning methods for Indo-Gangetic Plain
    Chaturvedi, Manisha
    Mall, Rajesh Kumar
    Singh, Saumya
    Chaubey, Pawan K.
    Pandey, Ankur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 44 (03) : 953 - 972
  • [39] Predicting NEPSE index price using deep learning models
    Pokhrel, Nawa Raj
    Dahal, Keshab Raj
    Rimal, Ramchandra
    Bhandari, Hum Nath
    Khatri, Rajendra K. C.
    Rimal, Binod
    Hahn, William Edward
    MACHINE LEARNING WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 9
  • [40] Inconsistency in historical simulations and future projections of temperature and rainfall: A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models over Southeast Asia
    Hamed, Mohammed Magdy
    Nashwan, Mohamed Salem
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    bin Ismail, Tarmizi
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    Dewan, Ashraf
    Asaduzzaman, Md
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2022, 265