Intercomparison of deep learning models in predicting streamflow patterns: insight from CMIP6

被引:2
|
作者
Anwar, Hamid [1 ]
Khan, Afed Ullah [1 ]
Ullah, Basir [1 ]
Taha, Abubakr Taha Bakheit [2 ,3 ]
Najeh, Taoufik [4 ]
Badshah, Muhammad Usman [5 ]
Ghanim, Abdulnoor A. J. [6 ]
Irfan, Muhammad [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
[2] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
[3] Red Sea Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Port 36481, Sudan
[4] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, Operat & Maintenance, Operat Maintenance & Acoust, Lulea, Sweden
[5] Water & Power Div, Peshawar, Pakistan
[6] Najran Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
[7] Najran Univ Saudi Arabia, Coll Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Streamflow; Prediction; Deep learning; GCM; CMIP6;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-63989-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This research was carried out to predict daily streamflow for the Swat River Basin, Pakistan through four deep learning (DL) models: Feed Forward Artificial Neural Networks (FFANN), Seasonal Artificial Neural Networks (SANN), Time Lag Artificial Neural Networks (TLANN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) under two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) 585 and 245. Taylor Diagram, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting techniques were used to select the best combination of General Circulation Models (GCMs) for Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) computation. MME was computed via the Random Forest technique for Maximum Temperature (Tmax), Minimum Temperature (Tmin), and precipitation for the aforementioned three techniques. The best MME for Tmax, Tmin, and precipitation was rendered by Compromise Programming. The DL models were trained and tested using observed precipitation and temperature as independent variables and discharge as dependent variables. The results of deep learning models were evaluated using statistical performance indicators such as root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The TLANN demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models based on RMSE, MSE, MAE, and R2 during training (65.25 m3/s, 4256.97 m3/s, 46.793 m3/s and 0.7978) and testing (72.06 m3/s, 5192.95 m3/s, 51.363 m3/s and 0.7443) respectively. Subsequently, TLANN was utilized to make predictions based on MME of SSP245 and SSP585 scenarios for future streamflow until the year 2100. These results can be used for planning, management, and policy-making regarding water resources projects in the study area.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Future precipitation patterns: investigating the IDF curve shifts under CMIP6 pathways
    Khan, Muhammad Ibrahim
    Khan, Fayaz Ahmad
    Khan, Afed Ullah
    Ullah, Basir
    Ghanim, Abdulnoor A. J.
    Al-Areeq, Ahmed M.
    Taha, Abubakr Taha Bakheit
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2025, 27 (03) : 357 - 380
  • [22] Understanding the Climate Change and Land Use Impact on Streamflow in the Present and Future under CMIP6 Climate Scenarios for the Parvara Mula Basin, India
    Mohseni, Usman
    Agnihotri, Prasit G. G.
    Pande, Chaitanya B. B.
    Durin, Bojan
    WATER, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [23] Hydrological droughts in the southern Andes (40-45°S) from an ensemble experiment using CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Aguayo, Rodrigo
    Leon-Munoz, Jorge
    Garreaud, Rene
    Montecinos, Aldo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [24] Climate change impact on photovoltaic power potential in China based on CMIP6 models
    Niu, Jiayun
    Qin, Wenmin
    Wang, Lunche
    Zhang, Ming
    Wu, Jinyang
    Zhang, Yujie
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 858
  • [25] Deep Learning for Bias-Correcting CMIP6-Class Earth System Models
    Hess, Philipp
    Lange, Stefan
    Schoetz, Christof
    Boers, Niklas
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [26] A novel insight on input variable and time lag selection in daily streamflow forecasting using deep learning models
    Khatun, Amina
    Nisha, M. N.
    Chatterjee, Siddharth
    Sridhar, Venkataramana
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2024, 179
  • [27] FIO-ESM v2.0 Outputs for the CMIP6 Global Monsoons Model Intercomparison Project Experiments
    Song, Yajuan
    Li, Xinfang
    Bao, Ying
    Song, Zhenya
    Wei, Meng
    Shu, Qi
    Yang, Xiaodan
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 37 (10) : 1045 - 1056
  • [28] Performance evaluations of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models for precipitation simulation over the Hanjiang River Basin, China
    Wang, Dong
    Liu, Jiahong
    Wang, Hao
    Shao, Weiwei
    Mei, Chao
    Ding, Xiangyi
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (05) : 2089 - 2106
  • [29] Assessing the impact of climate change on streamflow in the Tamor River Basin, Nepal: an analysis using SWAT and CMIP6 scenarios
    Suresh Raj Subedi
    Manoj Lamichhane
    Susan Dhungana
    Bibek Chalise
    Shishir Bhattarai
    Upendra Chaulagain
    Rakesh Khatiwada
    Discover Civil Engineering, 1 (1):
  • [30] Unravelling the influence of subjectivity on ranking of CMIP6 based climate models: A case study
    Anil, Suram
    Manikanta, Velpuri
    Pallakury, Anand Raj
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (13) : 5998 - 6016