Accuracy, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability of pressure-based insoles for gait measurement in chronic stroke patients

被引:0
|
作者
Neumann, Saskia [1 ,2 ]
Bauer, Christoph M. [3 ]
Nastasi, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Laderach, Julia [2 ]
Thurlimann, Eva [4 ]
Schwarz, Anne [4 ]
Held, Jeremia P. O. [4 ]
Easthope, Chris A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] DART, Lake Lucerne Inst, Vitznau, Switzerland
[2] Cereneo Fdn, Vitznau, Switzerland
[3] Lake Lucerne Inst, Therapy Sci Grp, Vitznau, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Vasc Neurol & Neurorehabil, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
stroke; reliability and validity; gait disorders; spatiotemporal gait parameters; wearables; rehabilitation; gait; pressure insoles; EVENT DETECTION; WALKING; PARAMETERS; PEOPLE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3389/fdgth.2024.1359771
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Wearables are potentially valuable tools for understanding mobility behavior in individuals with neurological disorders and how it changes depending on health status, such as after rehabilitation. However, the accurate detection of gait events, which are crucial for the evaluation of gait performance and quality, is challenging due to highly individual-specific patterns that also vary greatly in movement and speed, especially after stroke. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability of a commercially available insole system in the detection of gait events and the calculation of stance duration in individuals with chronic stroke.Methods Pressure insole data were collected from 17 individuals with chronic stroke during two measurement blocks, each comprising three 10-min walking tests conducted in a clinical setting. The gait assessments were recorded with a video camera that served as a ground truth, and pressure insoles as an experimental system. We compared the number of gait events and stance durations between systems.Results and discussion Over all 3,820 gait events, 90.86% were correctly identified by the insole system. Recall values ranged from 0.994 to 1, with a precision of 1 for all measurements. The F1 score ranged from 0.997 to 1. Excellent absolute agreement (Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.874) was observed for the calculation of the stance duration, with a slightly longer stance duration recorded by the insole system (difference of -0.01 s). Bland-Altmann analysis indicated limits of agreement of 0.33 s that were robust to changes in walking speed. This consistency makes the system well-suited for individuals post-stroke. The test-retest reliability between measurement timepoints T1 and T2 was excellent (ICC = 0.928). The mean difference in stance duration between T1 and T2 was 0.03 s. We conclude that the insole system is valid for use in a clinical setting to quantitatively assess continuous walking in individuals with stroke.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Test-Retest Reliability of PODOSmart(R) Gait Analysis Insoles
    Loukovitis, Andreas
    Ziagkas, Efthymios
    Zekakos, Dimitrios Xypolias
    Petrelis, Alexandros
    Grouios, George
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (22)
  • [2] Reaching performance scale for stroke - Test-retest reliability, measurement error, concurrent and discriminant validity
    Subramanian, Sandeep K.
    Banina, Melanie C.
    Turolla, Andrea
    Levin, Mindy F.
    PM&R, 2022, 14 (03) : 337 - 347
  • [3] Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of Pressure-Detecting Insoles for Static and Dynamic Movements in Healthy Young Adults
    Lambrich, Johanna
    Hagen, Marco
    Schwiertz, Gerrit
    Muehlbauer, Thomas
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (10)
  • [4] Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Virtual Peg Insertion Test to quantify upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke
    Bernadette C. Tobler-Ammann
    Eling D. de Bruin
    Marie-Christine Fluet
    Olivier Lambercy
    Rob A. de Bie
    Ruud H. Knols
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 13
  • [5] Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Virtual Peg Insertion Test to quantify upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke
    Tobler-Ammann, Bernadette C.
    de Bruin, Eling D.
    Fluet, Marie-Christine
    Lambercy, Olivier
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Knols, Ruud H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 13
  • [6] Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a digital manovacuometer
    Vieira, Danielle
    Pessoa, Isabela Sclauser
    Pereira, Hugo
    Aguiar, Larissa
    Tagliaferri, Thaysa
    Silva, Luisa
    Parreira, Veronica
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [7] Impact of cognition on test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of n-back for Chinese stroke patients
    Liu, Xiuzhen
    Li, Fang
    Song, Weiqun
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2024, 31 (06) : 1270 - 1278
  • [8] The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of 360° turn test in patients with knee osteoarthritis
    Yarar, Haci Ahmet
    Narin, Selnur
    Erduran, Mehmet
    Gurbanov, Iftikhar
    SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 2024, 41 (02): : 90 - 96
  • [9] Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of Spatiotemporal Running Parameter Measurement Using Embedded Inertial Measurement Unit Insoles
    Riglet, Louis
    Orliac, Baptiste
    Delphin, Corentin
    Leonard, Audrey
    Eby, Nicolas
    Ornetti, Paul
    Laroche, Davy
    Gueugnon, Mathieu
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (16)
  • [10] CONCURRENT VALIDITY AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE WALKBOT-K SYSTEM FOR ROBOTIC GAIT TRAINING
    Lee, Dong Ryul
    Shin, Yoon Kyum
    Park, Ji-Ho
    You, Joshua Hyun
    Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 2016, 16 (08)