Optimization of synchrotron radiation parameters using swarm intelligence and evolutionary algorithms

被引:1
作者
Karaca, Adnan Sahin [1 ]
Bostanci, Erkan [1 ]
Ketenoglu, Didem [2 ]
Harder, Manuel [3 ,4 ]
Canbay, Ali Can [5 ]
Ketenoglu, Bora [2 ]
Eren, Engin [6 ]
Aydin, Ayhan [1 ]
Yin, Zhong [7 ]
Guzel, Mehmet Serdar [1 ]
Martins, Michael [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Ankara Univ, Dept Engn Phys, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkiye
[3] European XFEL GmbH, Schenefeld, Germany
[4] Hamburg Univ, Dept Phys, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany
[5] Ankara Univ, Dept Phys, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye
[6] Deutsch Elektronen Synchrotron DESY, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany
[7] Tohoku Univ, Int Ctr Synchrotron Radiat Innovat Smart SRIS, Sendai, Miyagi 9808577, Japan
[8] Hamburg Univ, Inst Expt Phys, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany
[9] Ctr Free Elect Laser Sci CFEL, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
synchrotron beamlines; KB mirrors; Be compound refractive lenses; swarm intelligence; evolutionary algorithms; multi-objective optimization; MULTIOBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; BEAMLINE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1107/S1600577524000717
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Alignment of each optical element at a synchrotron beamline takes days, even weeks, for each experiment costing valuable beam time. Evolutionary algorithms (EAs), efficient heuristic search methods based on Darwinian evolution, can be utilized for multi-objective optimization problems in different application areas. In this study, the flux and spot size of a synchrotron beam are optimized for two different experimental setups including optical elements such as lenses and mirrors. Calculations were carried out with the X-ray Tracer beamline simulator using swarm intelligence (SI) algorithms and for comparison the same setups were optimized with EAs. The EAs and SI algorithms used in this study for two different experimental setups are the Genetic Algorithm (GA), Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Artificial Bee Colony (ABC). While one of the algorithms optimizes the lens position, the other focuses on optimizing the focal distances of Kirkpatrick-Baez mirrors. First, mono-objective evolutionary algorithms were used and the spot size or flux values checked separately. After comparison of mono-objective algorithms, the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II was run for both objectives - minimum spot size and maximum flux. Every algorithm configuration was run several times for Monte Carlo simulations since these processes generate random solutions and the simulator also produces solutions that are stochastic. The results show that the PSO algorithm gives the best values over all setups.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 429
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Genetic algorithm in search, optimization, and machine learning
[2]  
Appel S., 2017, Proceedings of IPAC 2017, P3941
[3]   A multiple objective evolutionary algorithm approach to find optimal design parameters for beam position [J].
Aydin, Ayhan ;
Bostanci, Erkan ;
Tanriover, Omer Ozgur .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2020, 31 (03)
[4]  
Catani L., 1997, AIP Conf. Proc., V391, P309
[5]  
Chubar O, 2007, AIP CONF PROC, V879, P607
[6]   Beamline optics layout preparation and evaluation of an undulator based atomic molecular and optical science research beamline at Indus-2 synchrotron radiation source [J].
Das, A. K. ;
Sekhar, B. N. Raja ;
Jagatap, B. N. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (12) :1235-1244
[7]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[8]  
Hart M, 1996, NATO ADV SCI I B-PHY, V357, P73
[9]   Ray Tracing Based Performance Optimization of an X-Ray Beamline that Incorporates a Sagittally Curved Mirror [J].
Heredia, Emilio ;
Yates, Brian ;
Chernikov, Roman .
13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION INSTRUMENTATION (SRI2018), 2019, 2054
[10]  
Karaboga D., 2010, Scholarpedia, V5, P6915, DOI [10.4249/scholarpedia.6915, DOI 10.4249/SCHOLARPEDIA.6915]