'A commitment to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion': a conceptual framework for equality of opportunity in Patient and Public Involvement in research

被引:1
作者
Lignou, Sapfo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sheehan, Mark [1 ]
Singh, Ilina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Big Data Inst, Wellcome Ctr Eth & Humanities, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Old Rd Campus, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Big Data Inst, Ethox Ctr, Old Rd Campus, Oxford, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Patient and public involvement; Equality; Diversity and Inclusion; equality of opportunity; health research; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/17470161231224060
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Many research institutions and funders have recently stated their commitment to actively support and promote 'Equality, Diversity and Inclusion' (EDI) in various aspects of health research including Patient and Public Involvement (PPI). However, translating this commitment into specific research projects presents significant challenges that existing approaches, practical guidelines and initiatives have not adequately addressed. In this paper, we explore how the lack of clear justifications for the EDI commitment in existing guidelines inadvertently complicates the work of those involved with PPI and we stress the need for conceptual clarity for any EDI effort to yield meaningful results. Our focus centres on the first principle of the EDI discourse, 'equality', particularly in the form of 'equality of opportunity' as outlined in current guidance provided by the National Institute of Health Research in the United Kingdom. We examine challenges related to justifying and implementing a general, unspecified commitment to equality of opportunity and explain that this reflects a lack of consensus regarding the moral value of PPI in research - a profound problem that remains unaddressed. We then discuss how the presence of several opposing moral perspectives on PPI, makes determining the most appropriate way of addressing barriers to involvement complex and controversial, raising ethical implications for the work of health researchers, PPI specialists and coordinators. Finally we make suggestions on how future research can enrich the concept of 'equality of opportunity' in PPI and improve practice. While our primary focus is on the NIHR, a strong advocate of PPI in research, this analysis will point to normative and ethical considerations that may be relevant to other research institutions and funding organisations aiming to promote equality of opportunity in their public and patient involvement strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 303
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research? [J].
Ashcroft, Joanne ;
Wykes, Til ;
Taylor, Joseph ;
Crowther, Adam ;
Szmukler, George .
JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 25 (01) :28-35
[2]   A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials – a work in progress [J].
Bagley H.J. ;
Short H. ;
Harman N.L. ;
Hickey H.R. ;
Gamble C.L. ;
Woolfall K. ;
Young B. ;
Williamson P.R. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 2 (1)
[3]  
Baker J., 2004, EQUALITY
[4]   Giving patients a voice: implementing patient and public involvement to strengthen research in sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Bedwell, Carol ;
Lavender, Tina .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 74 (04) :307-310
[5]  
Beresford P., 2003, Nursing Times Research, V8, P36, DOI DOI 10.1177/136140960300800106
[6]  
Beresford P., 1997, Doing disability research, P66
[7]   A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities [J].
Brett, Jo ;
Staniszewska, Sophie ;
Mockford, Carole ;
Herron-Marx, Sandra ;
Hughes, John ;
Tysall, Colin ;
Suleman, Rashida .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (04) :387-395
[8]   From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy [J].
Burgess, Michael M. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (01) :48-52
[9]   What Makes Epistemic Injustice an "Injustice"? [J].
Byskov, Morten Fibieger .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 52 (01) :116-133
[10]  
Cancer Research UK, EQUALITY DIVERSITY I