Adaptive responses to living in stressful habitats: Do invasive and native plant populations use different strategies?

被引:0
作者
Wan, Justin S. H. [1 ,9 ]
Bonser, Stephen P. [2 ]
Pang, Clara K. [3 ]
Fazlioglu, Fatih [4 ]
Rutherford, Susan [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Australian Inst Bot Sci, Res Ctr Ecosyst Resilience, Royal Bot Garden Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales UNSW, Evolut & Ecol Res Ctr, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Australian Inst Bot Sci, PlantClin, Royal Bot Garden, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Bayreuth, Plant Ecol, Bayreuth, Germany
[5] Wenzhou Kean Univ, Coll Sci Math & Technol, Ctr Sustainable Environm & Ecosyst Res, Dept Environm Sci, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[6] Kean Univ, Dorothy & George Hennings Coll Sci Math & Technol, Dept Environm & Sustainabil Sci, Union, NJ USA
[7] Zhejiang Bioinformat Int Sci & Technol Cooperat Ct, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[8] Wenzhou Municipal Key Lab Appl Biomed & Biopharmac, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[9] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Bayesian phylogenetic analysis; environmental stress; local adaptation; specialization; trade-off; INTRASPECIFIC TRAIT VARIATION; RESOURCE-USE STRATEGIES; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; LIFE-HISTORY; EVOLUTION; GROWTH; DROUGHT; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1111/ele.14419
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Plants inhabit stressful environments characterized by a variety of stressors, including mine sites, mountains, deserts, and high latitudes. Populations from stressful and reference (non-stressful) sites often have performance differences. However, while invasive and native species may respond differently to stressful environments, there is limited understanding of the patterns in reaction norms of populations from these sites. Here, we use phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis to assess the performance of populations under stress and non-stress conditions. We ask whether stress populations of natives and invasives differ in the magnitude of lowered performance under non-stress conditions and if they vary in the degree of performance advantage under stress. We also assessed whether these distinctions differ with stress intensity. Our findings revealed that natives not only have greater adaptive advantages but also more performance reductions than invasives. Populations from very stressful sites had more efficient adaptations, and performance costs increased with stress intensity in natives only. Overall, the results support the notion that adaptation is frequently costless. Reproductive output was most closely associated with adaptive costs and benefits. Our study characterized the adaptive strategies used by invasive and native plants under stressful conditions, thereby providing important insights into the limitations of adaptation to extreme sites. The global literature on performance of plants from stress and non-stress habitats was synthesized to evaluate reaction norms across native and invasive species. Invasive species had weaker responses to stress compared to natives, and cost efficiency of responses was generally higher for both natives and invasives. Costs do not increase with stress intensity in invasives, whereas associated costs increase with stress intensity in natives, and overall, our study provides important insights into limitations of adaptation to extreme sites.image
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 113 条
  • [61] Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants
    Linhart, YB
    Grant, MC
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1996, 27 : 237 - 277
  • [62] Salt-tolerant native plants have greater responses to other environments when compared to salt-tolerant invasive plants
    Liu, Muxin
    Liao, Huixuan
    Peng, Shaolin
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (13): : 7808 - 7818
  • [63] Contrasting plant adaptation strategies to latitude in the native and invasive range of Spartina alterniflora
    Liu, Wenwen
    Zhang, Yihui
    Chen, Xincong
    Maung-Douglass, Keith
    Strong, Donald R.
    Pennings, Steven C.
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2020, 226 (02) : 623 - 634
  • [64] The specialization hypothesis for phenotypic plasticity in plants
    Lortie, CJ
    Aarssen, LW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 1996, 157 (04) : 484 - 487
  • [65] Moher D, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V151, P264, DOI [10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.i4086]
  • [66] Assessing the evidence for latitudinal gradients in plant defence and herbivory
    Moles, Angela T.
    Bonser, Stephen P.
    Poore, Alistair G. B.
    Wallis, Ian R.
    Foley, William J.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 25 (02) : 380 - 388
  • [67] Higher plasticity in ecophysiological traits enhances the performance and invasion success of Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) in alpine environments
    Molina-Montenegro, Marco A.
    Penuelas, Josep
    Munne-Bosch, Sergi
    Sardans, Jordi
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2012, 14 (01) : 21 - 33
  • [68] Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius) in Florida and South America: evidence of a possible niche shift driven by hybridization
    Mukherjee, A.
    Williams, D. A.
    Wheeler, G. S.
    Cuda, J. P.
    Pal, S.
    Overholt, W. A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2012, 14 (07) : 1415 - 1430
  • [69] Extended leaf phenology has limited benefits for invasive species growing at northern latitudes
    O'Connell, Erin
    Savage, Jessica
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2020, 22 (10) : 2957 - 2974
  • [70] Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension
    O'Dea, Rose E.
    Lagisz, Malgorzata
    Jennions, Michael D.
    Koricheva, Julia
    Noble, Daniel W. A.
    Parker, Timothy H.
    Gurevitch, Jessica
    Page, Matthew J.
    Stewart, Gavin
    Moher, David
    Nakagawa, Shinichi
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2021, 96 (05) : 1695 - 1722