Sex Differences in Cognitive Reflection: A Meta-Analysis

被引：2
作者：
Otero, Inmaculada [1 ]
Martinez, Alexandra [1 ]
Cuadrado, Damaris [1 ]
Lado, Mario [1 ]
Moscoso, Silvia [1 ]
Salgado, Jesus F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Labour Relat, Campus Vida, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
来源：
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE | 2024年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词：
cognitive reflection; sex differences; meta-analysis; cognitive reflection test; DECISION-MAKING; BEHAVIORAL BIASES; MATHEMATICS; GENDER; PERFORMANCE; ABILITIES; BELIEFS;
D O I：
10.3390/jintelligence12040039
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
The current study presents a meta-analytic review of the differences between men and women in cognitive reflection (CR). The study also explores whether the type of CR test (i.e., numerical tests and verbal tests) moderates the relationship between CR and sex. The results showed that men score higher than women on CR, although the magnitude of these differences was small. We also found out that the type of CR test moderates the sex differences in CR, especially in the numerical tests. In addition, the results showed that the length of numerical tests (i.e., number of items) does not affect the differences between men and women in CR. Finally, the implications of these results are discussed, and future research is suggested.
引用
收藏
页数：15
相关论文
共 127 条
  • [1] Measuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations
    Aczel, Balazs
    Bago, Bence
    Szollosi, Aba
    Foldes, Andrei
    Lukacs, Bence
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [2] Aktas B, 2017, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V12, P297
  • [3] Albaity M, 2014, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V9, P148
  • [4] Cognitive Reflection, Decision Biases, and Response Times
    Alos-Ferrer, Carlos
    Garagnani, Michele
    Huegelschaefer, Sabine
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [5] Faith in intuition and behavioral biases
    Alos-Ferrer, Carlos
    Huegelschaefer, Sabine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 84 (01) : 182 - 192
  • [6] Avram L-A., 2018, Studia Universitatis Babes Bolyai-Oeconomica, V63, P56, DOI [DOI 10.2478/SUBBOEC-2018-0014, 10.2478/subboec-2018-0014]
  • [7] Bar-Hillel M, 2019, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V14, P620
  • [8] Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)?
    Baron, Jonathan
    Scott, Sydney
    Fincher, Katrina
    Metz, S. Emlen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2015, 4 (03) : 265 - 284
  • [9] Cognitive Reflection But Not Reinforcement Sensitivity Is Consistently Associated With Delay Discounting of Gains and Losses
    Bialek, Michal
    Bergelt, Max
    Majima, Yoshimasa
    Koehler, Derek J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE PSYCHOLOGY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 12 (3-4) : 169 - 183
  • [10] THE COGNITIVE-MISER RESPONSE MODEL: TESTING FOR INTUITIVE AND DELIBERATE REASONING
    Boeckenholt, Ulf
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2012, 77 (02) : 388 - 399
12345678910