Photovoltaic System MPPT Algorithm Based on Adaptive Radial Basis Function Neural Network

被引:0
作者
Wang Z. [1 ]
Guo J. [1 ]
Xiao W. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan Uiversity, Changsha
来源
Hunan Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences | 2019年 / 46卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Adaptive; Maximum Power Point Tracking(MPPT); Neural network; Photovoltaic system;
D O I
10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2019.10.011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The power-voltage characteristic curve of photovoltaic system has multiple peaks under partial shade condition. The traditional maximum power tracking method can easily trace to the local maximum power point. To solve such shortcoming, a photovoltaic system Maximum Power Point Tracking(MPPT) algorithm based on adaptive radial basis function neural network is proposed. The model optimizes the extended constants and weights of RBF neural network with adaptive linear algorithm, which overcomes the shortcomings of traditional neural network algorithm with slow convergence speed and poor global optimization. The simulation of adaptive RBF neural network is carried out in MATLAB/Simulink environment. The results show that the proposed algorithm can accurately find the maximum power point of the photovoltaic system when the external illumination and temperature change. Moreover the convergence accuracy and convergence time are greatly improved. © 2019, Editorial Department of Journal of Hunan University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 100
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Zhou H.A., Meng Z.Q., Wang B.T., Fixed-frequency-sliding-mode controller used in photovoltaic system MPPT, Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 42, 10, pp. 97-101, (2015)
  • [2] Peng L.L., Xu W., Li L.M., Et al., An improved perturb and observe algorithm for photovoltaic motion carriers, Materials Science and Engineering, 322, (2018)
  • [3] Sellami A., Kandoussi K., Otmani R.E., Et al., A novel auto-scaling MPPT algorithm based on perturb and observe method for photovoltaic modules under partial shading conditions, Applied Solar Energy, 54, 3, pp. 149-158, (2018)
  • [4] Manganiello P., Ricco M., Petrone G., Et al., Optimization of perturbative PV MPPT methods through online system identification, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61, 12, pp. 6812-6821, (2018)
  • [5] Zhou D.B., Chen Y.R., Maximum power point tracking strategy based on modified variable step-size incremental conductance algorithm, Power System Technology, 39, 6, pp. 1491-1498, (2015)
  • [6] Huynh D.C., Dunnigan M.W., Development and comparison of an improved incremental conductance algorithm for tracking the MPP of a solar PV panel, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 7, 4, pp. 1421-1429, (2016)
  • [7] Shahid H., Kamran M., Mehmood Z., Et al., Implementation of the novel temperature controller and incremental conductance MPPT algorithm for indoor photovoltaic system, Solar Energy, 163, pp. 235-242, (2018)
  • [8] Tafti H.D., Maswood A.I., Konstantinou G., Et al., A general constant power generation algorithm for photovoltaic systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 33, 5, pp. 4088-4101, (2018)
  • [9] Li X.S., Wen H.Q., Research on an improved b-based variable step MPPT algorithm, Power System Protection and Control, 44, 17, pp. 58-63, (2016)
  • [10] El-Khateb A., Rahim N.A., Selvaraj J., Et al., Fuzzy-logic-controller-based SEPIC converter for maximum power point tracking, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 50, 4, pp. 2349-2358, (2014)