Ex ante analysis of circular built environment policy coherence

被引:2
作者
Ancapi, Felipe Bucci [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Management Built Environm, Delft, Netherlands
来源
BUILDINGS & CITIES | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
built environment; circular city; circular economy; policy coherence analysis; policy evaluation; urban governance; ECONOMY; METABOLISM;
D O I
10.5334/bc.337
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
As European governments adopt new circular built environment policies to cope with the socio-ecological crisis, the need for evaluating such policies gains in urgency. Ex post evaluation is, however, difficult as these policies have not been in place long enough to have had significant effects. Nonetheless, ex ante policy evaluation may be possible by assessing policy coherence or the alignment and synergies of policy goals, instruments and implementation practices. This paper proposes a framework to analyse circular built environment policies. This framework is based on a combination of two existing analytical frameworks: circular city development and policy coherence analysis. The framework is tested for the case of a circular built environment in campus development at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, which is regarded as an urban development proxy. Policy documents and semi-structured interviews were analysed and coded. Results confirm previous findings about a prevailing focus on looping actions and indicates limited policy instrumentalisation across governance levels. Identified multilevel (in)coherence in circular city policy is pointed out as consequence of siloed-led and supply chain-based thinking and underdeveloped circular policy frameworks. Finally, the analytical benefits of circular city development and policy coherence frameworks are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 593
页数:19
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] The circular built environment toolbox: A systematic literature review of policy instruments
    Ancapi, Felipe Bucci
    Van den Berghe, Karel
    van Bueren, Ellen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 373
  • [2] Comparison of GHG emissions from circular and conventional building components
    Andersen, Camilla Ernst
    Kanafani, Kai
    Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer
    Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard
    Birgisdottir, Harpa
    [J]. BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2020, 1 (01): : 379 - 392
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, GROWTH CIRCULAR EC V
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, A Circular Economy in the Netherlands by 2050: Government-wide Programme for a Circular Economy
  • [5] Bucci Ancapi F., 2022, PALGRAVE ENCY URBAN, P1
  • [6] Carbone M., 2008, J. Eur. Integr., V30, P323, DOI DOI 10.1080/07036330802144992
  • [7] Does reframing urban policy around wellbeing support carbon mitigation?
    Chapman, Ralph
    Howden-Chapman, Philippa
    [J]. BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2021, 2 (01): : 688 - 699
  • [8] A systemic perspective on transition barriers to a circular infrastructure sector
    Coenen, Tom B. J.
    Visscher, Klaasjan
    Volker, Leentje
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 41 (01) : 22 - 43
  • [9] Colander D., 2014, Complexity and the art of public policy: Solving societys problems from the bottom up, DOI [10.1515/9781400850136, DOI 10.1515/9781400850136]
  • [10] E ffective governance of circular economies: An international comparison
    Cramer, Jacqueline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 343