Patient and Public Perceptions in Canada About Decentralized and Hybrid Clinical Trials: "It's About Time we Bring Trials to People"

被引:1
作者
Richards, Dawn P. [1 ]
Queenan, John [2 ]
Aasen-Johnston, Linnea [3 ]
Douglas, Heather [4 ]
Hawrysh, Terry [4 ]
Lapenna, Michael [4 ]
Lillie, Donna [4 ]
McIntosh, Emily I. [4 ]
Shea, Jenna [4 ]
Smith, Maureen [4 ]
Marlin, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] MaRS Ctr, Clin Trials Ontario, West Tower,661 Univ Ave,Suite 460, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[3] BESPOKE Business Solut Inc, 135 Coons Rd, Richmond Hill, ON L4E 2M9, Canada
[4] MaRS Ctr, Clin Trials Ontario, Coll Lived Experience, West Tower,661 Univ Ave,Suite 460, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada
关键词
Decentralized clinical trials; Hybrid clinical trials; Public perceptions; Public perspectives; Patient Perceptions; Patient Perspectives; Survey;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-024-00665-y
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Little is known about patient and the public perspectives on decentralized and hybrid clinical trials in Canada.Methods We conducted an online survey (English and French) promoted on social media to understand perspectives of people in Canada about decentralized and hybrid clinical trials. The survey had two sections. We co-produced this project entirely with patient, caregiver, and family partners.Results The survey had 284 (14 French) individuals who started or completed Section 1, and 180 (16 French) individuals who started or completed Section 2. People prefer to have options to participate in clinical trials where aspects are decentralized or hybridized. 79% of respondents preferred to have options related to study visits. There were concerns about handling adverse events or potential complications in decentralized trials, however, communication options such as a dedicated contact person for participants was deemed helpful. Most respondents were amenable to informed consent being done at a satellite site closer to home or via technology and were split on privacy concerns about this. Most preferred travel to a site within an hour, depending on what the trial was for or its impact on quality of life. Due to the response rate, we were unable to explore associations with gender, age, health status, geography, ethnicity, and prior clinical trial participation.Conclusion Our findings indicate an openness in Canada to participating in trials that decentralize or hybridize some aspects. These trials are perceived to provide benefits to participants and ways to increase equity and accessibility for participants.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 977
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Association of Remote Technology Use and Other Decentralization Tools With Patient Likelihood to Enroll in Cancer Clinical Trials [J].
Adams, Devon V. ;
Long, Sarah ;
Fleury, Mark E. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (07) :E2220053
[2]  
[Anonymous], COLL LIVED EXPERIENC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Qualtrics
[4]  
[Anonymous], RES DATA MANAGEMENT
[5]  
[Anonymous], QUEENS U ELECT INFOR
[6]   Legal, Regulatory, and Practical Issues to Consider When Adopting Decentralized Clinical Trials: Recommendations From the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative [J].
Apostolaros, Maria ;
Babaian, David ;
Corneli, Amy ;
Forrest, Annemarie ;
Hamre, Gerrit ;
Hewett, Jan ;
Podolsky, Laura ;
Popat, Vaishali ;
Randall, Penny .
THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2020, 54 (04) :779-787
[7]  
Center for the Information and Study of Clinical Research Participation, 2023, PERCEPTIONS INSIGHTS
[8]  
Center for the Information and Study of Clinical Research Participation (CISCRP), 2021, PERCEPTIONS INSIGHTS
[9]  
Clinical Trials Ontario, 2021, DECENTRALIZED TRIALS
[10]  
Clinical Trials Transformation Inititiative (CTTI), 2018, CTTI RECOMMENDATIONS